• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在南非一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中从司他夫定转换为替诺福韦的成本及成本效益

Cost and cost-effectiveness of switching from stavudine to tenofovir in first-line antiretroviral regimens in South Africa.

作者信息

Rosen Sydney, Long Lawrence, Fox Matthew, Sanne Ian

机构信息

Center for International Health and Development, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Jul 1;48(3):334-44. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817ae5ef.

DOI:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817ae5ef
PMID:18545151
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens in Africa include stavudine (d4T), despite the high incidence of toxicities related to it. We estimated the cost and cost-effectiveness of switching from d4T to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in South Africa.

METHODS

A model was developed to estimate the proportion of patients in a hypothetical cohort who experienced d4T- and TDF-related events over the 2 years after antiretroviral therapy initiation. Transition probabilities, event and drug costs, and utility losses were estimated from primary data and the literature. Outcomes included incremental cost, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year gained, and threshold prices for TDF.

RESULTS

After 2 years, 82.5% of the d4T scenario cohort remained on d4T, 16.6% had switched to AZT, 0.8% had died, and 414 events that did not lead to a drug change had occurred. In the TDF scenario, 97.5% of the cohort remained on TDF. At a baseline cost of TDF of $17.00/month, the incremental cost of the TDF scenario was $128/patient/year and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $9007 per quality-adjusted life year gained. The change to TDF would be cost neutral for the government at a price of $6.17/month and highly cost effective at a price of $12.94/month.

CONCLUSIONS

At a TDF price of $17.00/month, savings on d4T toxicity management will offset roughly 20% of the higher price of TDF. The price of TDF would have to fall substantially to make the change cost neutral for South Africa in budgetary terms, but it would be highly cost effective at a price only slightly less than what is currently available.

摘要

背景

尽管司他夫定(d4T)存在较高的相关毒性发生率,但非洲大多数一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案仍包含该药物。我们估算了南非从d4T转换为替诺福韦酯(TDF)的成本及成本效益。

方法

建立一个模型,以估算在抗逆转录病毒治疗开始后的2年中,假设队列中经历与d4T和TDF相关事件的患者比例。从原始数据和文献中估算转移概率、事件及药物成本以及效用损失。结果包括增量成本、每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比,以及TDF的阈值价格。

结果

2年后,d4T方案队列中82.5%的患者仍使用d4T,16.6%已转换为齐多夫定(AZT),0.8%死亡,且发生了414起未导致药物更换的事件。在TDF方案中,97.5%的队列仍使用TDF。在TDF基线成本为每月17.00美元的情况下,TDF方案的增量成本为每人每年128美元,增量成本效益比为每获得一个质量调整生命年9007美元。对于政府而言,当价格为每月6.17美元时,转换为TDF将实现成本中性,当价格为每月12.94美元时则具有很高的成本效益。

结论

在TDF价格为每月17.00美元时,d4T毒性管理方面的节省将大致抵消TDF较高价格的20%。TDF的价格必须大幅下降才能使南非在预算方面实现成本中性转换,但在仅略低于当前可用价格的情况下,它将具有很高的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Cost and cost-effectiveness of switching from stavudine to tenofovir in first-line antiretroviral regimens in South Africa.在南非一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案中从司他夫定转换为替诺福韦的成本及成本效益
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008 Jul 1;48(3):334-44. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31817ae5ef.
2
Cost and cost-effectiveness of switching from d4T or AZT to a TDF-based first-line regimen in a resource-limited setting in rural Lesotho.在莱索托农村资源有限的环境下,将 d4T 或 AZT 转换为 TDF 为基础的一线方案的成本和成本效益。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Nov 1;58(3):e68-74. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31822a9f8d.
3
Rates of switching antiretroviral drugs in a primary care service in South Africa before and after introduction of tenofovir.南非在引入替诺福韦前后初级保健服务中抗逆转录病毒药物转换率。
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063596. Print 2013.
4
Comparison of tenofovir, zidovudine, or stavudine as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited-setting: a cohort study.在资源有限的环境中,作为一线抗逆转录病毒治疗一部分的替诺福韦、齐多夫定或司他夫定的比较:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 14;8(5):e64459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064459. Print 2013.
5
A randomized, open-label study of the safety and efficacy of switching stavudine or zidovudine to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-1-infected children with virologic suppression.一项关于将司他夫定或齐多夫定换用为富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯对病毒学得到抑制的HIV-1感染儿童安全性和疗效的随机、开放标签研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Apr;34(4):376-82. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000289.
6
High prevalence of the K65R mutation in HIV-1 subtype C infected patients failing tenofovir-based first-line regimens in South Africa.在南非,接受基于替诺福韦的一线治疗方案失败的HIV-1 C亚型感染患者中,K65R突变的高流行率。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0118145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118145. eCollection 2015.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Low-Dose Stavudine Over 96 Weeks: A Multicountry Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯与低剂量司他夫定治疗 96 周的疗效和安全性:一项多国家、随机、非劣效性试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Feb 1;80(2):224-233. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001908.
8
The safety and efficacy of switching stavudine to tenofovir df in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz in hiv-1-infected patients: three-year follow-up after switching therapy.在HIV-1感染患者中,将司他夫定换用替诺福韦酯并联合拉米夫定和依非韦伦的安全性和有效性:换药治疗后的三年随访
HIV Clin Trials. 2007 Nov-Dec;8(6):381-90. doi: 10.1310/hct0806-381.
9
Antiviral efficacy and genotypic resistance patterns of combination therapy with stavudine/tenofovir in highly active antiretroviral therapy experienced patients.司他夫定/替诺福韦联合治疗在接受过高效抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者中的抗病毒疗效及基因型耐药模式
Antivir Ther. 2006;11(2):233-43.
10
Cost-effectiveness of tenofovir as first-line antiretroviral therapy in India.替诺福韦作为一线抗逆转录病毒治疗在印度的成本效益。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 1;50(3):416-25. doi: 10.1086/649884.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Low-Dose Stavudine Over 96 Weeks: A Multicountry Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯与低剂量司他夫定治疗 96 周的疗效和安全性:一项多国家、随机、非劣效性试验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Feb 1;80(2):224-233. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001908.
2
Five-year trends in treatment changes in an adult cohort of HIV/AIDS patients in Ghana: a retrospective cohort study.加纳成年艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者队列治疗变化的五年趋势:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2752-7.
3
Risks associated with antiretroviral treatment for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): qualitative analysis of social media data and health state utility valuation.
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗逆转录病毒治疗相关风险:社交媒体数据的定性分析与健康状态效用评估
Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul;26(7):1785-1798. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1519-3. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
4
Active Surveillance versus Spontaneous Reporting for First-Line Antiretroviral Medicines in Namibia: A Cost-Utility Analysis.纳米比亚一线抗逆转录病毒药物的主动监测与自发报告:成本效用分析
Drug Saf. 2016 Sep;39(9):859-72. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0432-y.
5
The Impact of Company-Level ART Provision to a Mining Workforce in South Africa: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.公司层面为南非采矿劳动力提供抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响:成本效益分析
PLoS Med. 2015 Sep 1;12(9):e1001869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001869. eCollection 2015 Sep.
6
Uptake of WHO recommendations for first-line antiretroviral therapy in Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia.肯尼亚、乌干达和赞比亚对世界卫生组织一线抗逆转录病毒疗法建议的采纳情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 25;10(3):e0120350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120350. eCollection 2015.
7
The cost of providing combined prevention and treatment services, including ART, to female sex workers in Burkina Faso.在布基纳法索为女性性工作者提供包括抗逆转录病毒治疗在内的综合预防和治疗服务的成本。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100107. eCollection 2014.
8
Incidence and predictors of first line antiretroviral regimen modification in western Kenya.肯尼亚西部一线抗逆转录病毒治疗方案调整的发生率和预测因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 2;9(4):e93106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093106. eCollection 2014.
9
Impact of choice of NRTI in first-line antiretroviral therapy: a cohort analysis of stavudine vs. tenofovir.一线抗逆转录病毒治疗中 NRTI 选择的影响:司他夫定与替诺福韦的队列分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 May;19(5):490-8. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12285. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
10
cART prescription trends in a prospective HIV cohort in rural Tanzania from 2007 to 2011.2007年至2011年坦桑尼亚农村地区一个前瞻性艾滋病毒队列中的抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART)处方趋势。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 20;14:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-90.