Stevenson L W
UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991 May-Jun;10(3):468-76.
Because of the limited supply of donor hearts, many candidates for heart transplantation must remain on waiting lists for several months. Although most such patients are considered to be refractory to standard therapy with vasodilators, diuretics, and digoxin, many will respond to a more intensive approach specifically tailored to hemodynamic goals in advanced heart failure. In this article the principles, design, and benefits of tailored therapy are reviewed. In addition, six common ideas about the management of advanced heart failure, derived from other patient populations, are shown to be myths. These myths are (1) that a low ejection fraction precludes good hemodynamics, exercise capacity, and survival; (2) that high ventricular filling pressures are necessary to maintain cardiac output in patients with chronic dilated heart failure; (3) that vasodilators in chronic advanced heart failure act primarily to increase ejection fraction and total stroke volume; (4) that hemodynamics measured during drug titration do not predict long-term benefit; (5) that the interval risk of deterioration and death without transplantation increases with time from evaluation; and (6) that for patients with low ejection fractions, heart transplantation is always better than medical therapy.
由于供体心脏供应有限,许多心脏移植候选人必须在等待名单上等待数月。尽管大多数此类患者被认为对血管扩张剂、利尿剂和地高辛的标准治疗无效,但许多患者会对针对晚期心力衰竭血流动力学目标专门制定的更强化治疗方法产生反应。本文回顾了个体化治疗的原则、设计和益处。此外,还指出了源于其他患者群体的关于晚期心力衰竭管理的六个常见误区。这些误区是:(1)低射血分数排除了良好的血流动力学、运动能力和生存率;(2)慢性扩张型心力衰竭患者需要高心室充盈压来维持心输出量;(3)慢性晚期心力衰竭中的血管扩张剂主要作用是增加射血分数和总 stroke 容积;(4)药物滴定期间测量的血流动力学不能预测长期益处;(5)未经移植的恶化和死亡的间隔风险随评估时间的增加而增加;(6)对于射血分数低的患者,心脏移植总是优于药物治疗。