Gerhardus Ansgar, Breckenkamp Jürgen, Razum Oliver
Abteilung Epidemiologie & International Public Health, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld.
Med Klin (Munich). 2008 Jun 15;103(6):406-12. doi: 10.1007/s00063-008-1060-9.
Public health aims at prevention and health promotion at the level of populations. Like in medicine, public health interventions should be based on the best available evidence. A coherent model for evidence-based public health (EBPH) is missing so far. This paper aims at developing a conceptual as well as operational model for EBPH.
Based on the concept of evidence-based medicine (EBM) a model of EBPH was developed that takes the specific situation of public health into account: (1) nonmedical aspects, e.g. ethical, sociocultural, or organizational aspects, are often more relevant in EBPH than in EBM. 2) Criteria for decision-making at population level are often different from those employed at the individual level. (3) Values and (vested) interests affect not only the decision itself but the whole process of decision-making, including the generation of the evidence.
A comprehensive model of EBPH that takes the aspects described above into account allows for the analysis of the interplay between decision-making and evidence in the complex reality of public health. This is illustrated using the introduction of the vaccination against human papillomavirus as an example.
公共卫生旨在在人群层面进行预防和促进健康。与医学一样,公共卫生干预应基于现有最佳证据。到目前为止,尚缺乏一个连贯的循证公共卫生(EBPH)模型。本文旨在开发一个EBPH的概念模型和操作模型。
基于循证医学(EBM)的概念,开发了一个考虑到公共卫生特殊情况的EBPH模型:(1)非医学方面,如伦理、社会文化或组织方面,在EBPH中往往比在EBM中更相关。(2)人群层面的决策标准通常与个体层面所采用的标准不同。(3)价值观和(既得)利益不仅影响决策本身,还影响整个决策过程,包括证据的产生。
一个考虑到上述方面的全面的EBPH模型允许在公共卫生的复杂现实中分析决策与证据之间的相互作用。以人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的引入为例进行了说明。