Playne M J, Smith B R
Biotechnology Group, CSIRO Division of Chemical Technology, PO Box 310, South Melbourne, Victoria 3205, Australia.
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983 May;25(5):1251-65. doi: 10.1002/bit.260250508.
Various forms of liquid-liquid extraction systems are being developed to separate products, such as ethanol and volatile fatty acids (VFA), from fermentation liquids, since distillation is energetically expensive. Continuous extraction is advantageous, as product inhibition of the fermentation is minimized. However, some extraction solvents may be toxic or inhibitory to microorganisms.Thirty organic chemicals were examined by means of a small scale (60 mL) batch fermentation bioassay procedure for their toxicity to a commercial inoculum (Methanobac, W.B.E. Ltd.), which was a mixed culture of facultatively anaerobic, acid-producing bacteria. Gas production, pH change of medium, and the concentrations of ethanol, VFA, and lactic acid were measured after 75 h growth. The optimum experimental conditions for toxicity testing were alfalfa as substrate (2 g), a buffered nutrient medium (pH 6.8), "Methanobac" inoculum (10 mL), and test chemicals at levels between 10 and 100 microL/mL.Thirteen chemicals were nontoxic, and included the paraffins (C(6)-C(12)), phthalates, organophosphorus compounds, Freon 113 (1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoro ethane), Aliquat 336 (tricaprylylmethyl ammonium chloride), di-isoamyl ether, and trioctylamine. Other amine extractants were partially toxic. Alcohols (C(5)-C(12)), ketones (C(5)-C(8)), benzene derivatives, isoamyl acetate, and di-isopropyl ether were toxic. Generally, the chemicals were not toxic unless present at levels in excess of that expected to be required to saturate the aqueous phase.Total gas production was a good indicator of toxicity even within 24 h, but the presence of homofermentative (nongas producing) lactic acid bacteria complicated interpretation."Methanobac" inoculum was compared with an inoculum derived from a rumen culture for four test chemicals. The results were essentially the same. However, the toxicity of a chemical to bacteria is likely to vary considerably between bacterial species.
由于蒸馏能耗高昂,人们正在开发各种液 - 液萃取系统,以从发酵液中分离产物,如乙醇和挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)。连续萃取具有优势,因为它能将发酵过程中的产物抑制降至最低。然而,一些萃取溶剂可能对微生物有毒或具有抑制作用。通过小规模(60毫升)分批发酵生物测定程序,检测了30种有机化学品对一种商业接种物(Methanobac,W.B.E.有限公司)的毒性,该接种物是兼性厌氧产酸细菌的混合培养物。在生长75小时后,测量气体产生量、培养基的pH变化以及乙醇、VFA和乳酸的浓度。毒性测试的最佳实验条件为:以苜蓿为底物(2克)、缓冲营养培养基(pH 6.8)、“Methanobac”接种物(10毫升)以及浓度在10至100微升/毫升之间的测试化学品。13种化学品无毒,包括石蜡(C(6)-C(12))、邻苯二甲酸盐、有机磷化合物、氟利昂113(1,1,2 - 三氯 - 1,2,2 - 三氟乙烷)、Aliquat 336(三辛基甲基氯化铵)、二异戊醚和三辛胺。其他胺类萃取剂有部分毒性。醇类(C(5)-C(12))、酮类(C(5)-C(8))、苯衍生物、乙酸异戊酯和二异丙醚有毒。一般来说,除非化学品的浓度超过预期使水相饱和所需的浓度,否则它们是无毒的。即使在24小时内,总气体产生量也是毒性的良好指标,但同型发酵(不产气)乳酸菌的存在使结果解读变得复杂。将“Methanobac”接种物与源自瘤胃培养物的接种物对四种测试化学品进行了比较。结果基本相同。然而,一种化学品对细菌的毒性在不同细菌种类之间可能有很大差异。