Corson Marshall A, Jones Peter H, Davidson Michael H
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 16;101(12A):41F-50F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.018.
A substantial body of peer-reviewed studies has been published validating the role of inflammation in atherogenesis and supporting lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) as a cardiovascular risk marker independent of and additive to traditional risk factors. As with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, an elevated Lp-PLA(2) level approximately doubles the risk for primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Interestingly, when both inflammatory markers are increased together, they provide an even greater predictive capability to help identify very-high-risk individuals who would benefit most from aggressive lipid-lowering therapy. High levels of Lp-PLA(2) are present in inflamed, rupture-prone plaques, and it appears that Lp-PLA(2) is released from these plaques into the circulation. Over 25 prospective epidemiologic studies have demonstrated the association of elevated Lp-PLA(2) levels with future coronary events and stroke-11 of 12 prospective studies have shown a statistically significant association between elevated Lp-PLA(2) and primary coronary or cardiovascular events, 12 of 13 have shown a statistically significant association with recurrent coronary or cardiovascular events, and 6 studies have shown a positive association with stroke. Lp-PLA(2) should be viewed today as an important cardiovascular risk marker whose utility is as an adjunct to the major risk factors to adjust absolute risk status and thereby modify low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. The low biologic fluctuation and high vascular specificity of Lp-PLA(2) makes it possible to use a single measurement in clinical decision making, and it also permits clinicians to follow the Lp-PLA(2) marker serially. Ultimately, Lp-PLA(2) may also be classified as a risk factor, but this should not detract from its utility today as a risk marker.
大量经过同行评审的研究已经发表,证实了炎症在动脉粥样硬化形成中的作用,并支持脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)作为一种独立于传统危险因素且可与之相加的心血管风险标志物。与高敏C反应蛋白升高的情况一样,Lp-PLA2水平升高会使原发性和继发性心血管事件的风险增加约一倍。有趣的是,当这两种炎症标志物同时升高时,它们具有更强的预测能力,有助于识别那些从积极降脂治疗中获益最大的极高风险个体。在易发生破裂的炎症斑块中存在高水平的Lp-PLA2,似乎Lp-PLA2是从这些斑块释放到循环系统中的。超过25项前瞻性流行病学研究已经证明Lp-PLA2水平升高与未来的冠状动脉事件和中风有关——12项前瞻性研究中的11项表明Lp-PLA2升高与原发性冠状动脉或心血管事件之间存在统计学上的显著关联,13项研究中的12项表明与复发性冠状动脉或心血管事件存在统计学上的显著关联,6项研究表明与中风存在正相关。如今,Lp-PLA2应被视为一种重要的心血管风险标志物,其作用是作为主要危险因素的辅助指标,以调整绝对风险状态,从而调整低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标。Lp-PLA2的低生物学波动性和高血管特异性使得在临床决策中可以使用单次测量,并且也允许临床医生连续跟踪Lp-PLA2标志物。最终,Lp-PLA2也可能被归类为一种危险因素,但这不应减损其如今作为风险标志物的效用。