Kouba Erik, Wallen Eric M, Pruthi Raj S
Division of Urologic Surgery and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
Treatment of ureteral obstruction due to advanced abdominal or pelvic malignancy is a clinical challenge. We discuss improvements and modern day outcomes in the palliative treatment of patients with ureteral obstruction by antegrade or retrograde ureteral decompression. Also, potential areas of clinical investigation involving ureteral stent improvement and pharmacological management of relief of symptoms resulting from ureteral obstruction are discussed.
A literature search was performed using the Entrez-PubMed(R) database. All relevant literature on ureteral obstruction, advanced malignancy and nephrostomy, ureteral stent and associated topics concerning palliative care and quality of life were reviewed and analyzed.
Presenting symptoms are varied and depend on the acuity of the underlying problem. Mechanisms underlying the pain and symptoms of extrinsic ureteral compression have not fully been explored but they may include prostaglandin and renin-angiotensin pathways with medical interventions potentially directed at such therapeutic targets. Progressive obstructive uropathy may likely lead to clinical manifestations, such as uremia, electrolyte imbalances and persistent urinary tract infections, if obstruction is not bypassed. New approaches to antegrade and retrograde stenting, and the evaluation of new stent materials may help minimize the complications and side effects of such procedures. Unfortunately the finding of ureteral obstruction due to malignancy carries a poor prognosis with a resulting median survival of 3 to 7 months. This prognosis highlights the importance of maintaining quality of life in these patients.
Patients presenting with symptoms of ureteral obstruction due to advanced malignancy should be informed of the therapeutic options in the context of the poor prognosis. In the meantime research is needed to find methods of urinary diversion and pharmacological intervention for symptomatic relief without compromising quality of life in patients at the end of life.
治疗由晚期腹部或盆腔恶性肿瘤引起的输尿管梗阻是一项临床挑战。我们讨论通过顺行或逆行输尿管减压对输尿管梗阻患者进行姑息治疗的改进措施及现代治疗效果。此外,还讨论了涉及输尿管支架改进及输尿管梗阻所致症状缓解的药物治疗等潜在临床研究领域。
使用Entrez-PubMed数据库进行文献检索。对所有关于输尿管梗阻、晚期恶性肿瘤及肾造瘘术、输尿管支架以及与姑息治疗和生活质量相关主题的文献进行了综述和分析。
呈现的症状多种多样,取决于潜在问题的严重程度。外在性输尿管压迫所致疼痛和症状的潜在机制尚未完全阐明,但可能包括前列腺素和肾素-血管紧张素途径,医学干预可能针对这些治疗靶点。如果梗阻未解除,进行性梗阻性肾病可能会导致诸如尿毒症、电解质失衡和持续性尿路感染等临床表现。顺行和逆行支架置入的新方法以及新型支架材料的评估可能有助于将此类手术的并发症和副作用降至最低。不幸的是,因恶性肿瘤导致输尿管梗阻的患者预后较差,中位生存期为3至7个月。这一预后凸显了维持这些患者生活质量的重要性。
对于因晚期恶性肿瘤出现输尿管梗阻症状的患者,应在预后较差的情况下告知其治疗选择。与此同时,需要开展研究以找到在不影响终末期患者生活质量的前提下进行尿液改道和药物干预以缓解症状的方法。