Miller Joshua D, Campbell W Keith, Pilkonis Paul A, Morse Jennifer Q
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA. jdmiller @uga.edu
Assessment. 2008 Dec;15(4):483-92. doi: 10.1177/1073191108319022. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
This study examined the degree of correspondence between two assessments for narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) in a mixed clinical and community sample--one using a self-report measure (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4) and the other using clinical judgments derived from an assessment based on the longitudinal, expert, all data (LEAD) methodology. NPD scores demonstrated moderate convergence for the total scores but weak convergence for the individual criteria. The authors also examined the correlates created by each set of NPD scores using Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI). The NPD scores demonstrated areas of convergence (e.g., Cooperativeness, Self-directedness) and divergence (i.e., Harm Avoidance, Novelty Seeking) with these personality scores. These divergences may be due to the wording of certain items on the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 NPD scale, which may require rewriting if it is to provide an assessment that is more highly convergent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders NPD construct.
本研究在一个混合的临床与社区样本中,考察了两种针对自恋型人格障碍(NPD)评估之间的对应程度——一种使用自我报告量表(人格诊断问卷-4),另一种使用基于纵向、专家、全数据(LEAD)方法的评估得出的临床判断。NPD总分显示出中等程度的收敛,但各单项标准的收敛程度较弱。作者还使用克隆宁格的气质与性格量表(TCI)考察了每组NPD分数所产生的相关性。这些NPD分数与这些人格分数显示出收敛的方面(如合作性、自我导向性)和发散的方面(即回避伤害、寻求新奇)。这些差异可能是由于人格诊断问卷-4的NPD量表上某些条目的措辞所致,如果要提供与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》中NPD结构更高度收敛的评估,可能需要重新措辞。