Miller Joshua D, Pilkonis Paul A, Clifton Allan
1. Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
J Pers Disord. 2005 Aug;19(4):400-19. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.400.
The current study used a psychiatric sample (N = 69) to examine: (1) the correspondence between self- and other-reports of general personality, as measured by the Five-Factor Model (FFM; Costa & McCrae, 1990), and personality disorder (PD) traits, as measured by a structured interview, (2) the relations between these two sets of ratings (FFM and PD traits) and consensus ratings of PD and impairment, and (3) the incremental validity of other-rated personality scores. Agreement between raters for the five domains of the FFM ranged from .23 (agreeableness) to .71 (openness); for the PD traits agreement ranged from .37 (avoidant) to .69 (antisocial). At both the domain and facet level, the personality profiles reflected in the correlations between the FFM scores and PD criteria were consistent across raters with the exception of narcissistic PD. Substantial evidence was found for the incremental validity of other-rated personality scores, with these ratings accounting for an additional 8 to 20% of the overall variance in PD features. The other-rated FFM scores also accounted for more variance in consensus ratings of impairment in the domains of romance, work, and social relations.
当前研究采用了一个精神病学样本（N = 69）来检验：（1）通过五因素模型（FFM；科斯塔和麦克雷，1990）测量的一般人格的自我报告与他人报告之间的对应关系，以及通过结构化访谈测量的人格障碍（PD）特质之间的对应关系；（2）这两组评分（FFM和PD特质）与PD和损害的共识评分之间的关系；（3）他人评定的人格分数的增量效度。FFM五个领域的评分者之间的一致性范围从0.23（宜人性）到0.71（开放性）；PD特质的一致性范围从0.37（回避型）到0.69（反社会型）。在领域和层面水平上，除了自恋型PD外，FFM分数与PD标准之间的相关性所反映的人格特征在评分者之间是一致的。发现了大量证据支持他人评定的人格分数的增量效度，这些评分占PD特征总体方差的另外8%至20%。他人评定的FFM分数在浪漫关系、工作和社会关系领域的损害共识评分中也占更多方差。
