Markowitz John C, Kocsis James H, Christos Paul, Bleiberg Kathryn, Carlin Alexandra
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Jun;196(6):468-74. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31817738f1.
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) has demonstrated efficacy for depression but yielded negative results for substance disorders. Alcohol abuse frequently complicates mood disorders. This pilot study compared IPT with brief supportive psychotherapy (BSP) for dysthymic disorder and alcohol abuse. We hypothesized that effect sizes would suggest greater IPT efficacy for both diagnoses, despite limited statistical power. Subjects with primary DSM-IV dysthymic disorder and secondary alcohol abuse/dependence were randomly assigned 16 weeks of IPT (N = 14) or BSP (N = 12). Patients in both treatments reported improved depressive symptoms and alcohol abstinence. IPT had a large and BSP a moderate effect size in depression, whereas BSP had a moderate and IPT a small effect size in percentage of days abstinent. This pilot study offers initial data on IPT and BSP for comorbid chronic depression and alcohol abuse/dependence. Results suggest IPT may have specific antidepressant benefits for dysthymic alcoholic patients but not in treating alcoholism.
人际心理治疗(IPT)已被证明对抑郁症有效,但对物质障碍却产生了负面结果。酒精滥用常常使情绪障碍复杂化。这项试点研究比较了IPT与简短支持性心理治疗(BSP)对恶劣心境障碍和酒精滥用的效果。我们假设,尽管统计效力有限,但效应量将表明IPT对这两种诊断的疗效更佳。患有原发性DSM-IV恶劣心境障碍和继发性酒精滥用/依赖的受试者被随机分配接受16周的IPT(N = 14)或BSP(N = 12)治疗。两种治疗的患者均报告抑郁症状有所改善且戒酒。在抑郁症方面,IPT的效应量较大,BSP的效应量中等;而在戒酒天数百分比方面,BSP的效应量中等,IPT的效应量较小。这项试点研究提供了关于IPT和BSP用于共病慢性抑郁症和酒精滥用/依赖的初步数据。结果表明,IPT可能对恶劣心境障碍的酗酒患者有特定的抗抑郁益处,但对治疗酒精中毒无效。