Berkman Benjamin E
O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington DC, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):372-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000324566.72533.0b.
Pandemic influenza response plans have placed a significant emphasis on school closures as a community mitigation strategy. However, school closures raise serious ethical concerns, many of which have been largely overlooked. First, evidence of this intervention's efficacy has not yet been firmly established, calling into question whether it will be useful against the threat. Second, school closures have the potential to create serious adverse consequences, which will disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. Thus, policy makers should focus on gathering more evidence about the efficacy of school closures and on strengthening communication and transparency about the strengths and weaknesses of any school-closure plan that they decide to adopt. Policy makers should also consider intermediate options, such as partial school closures, which might provide ways to reap many of the benefits of school closings, while minimizing the costs. Finally, policy makers must labor to ensure that the benefits and the burdens of any interventions are distributed equitably.
大流行性流感应对计划将学校关闭作为一项社区缓解策略予以了高度重视。然而,学校关闭引发了严重的伦理问题,其中许多问题在很大程度上被忽视了。首先,这种干预措施的有效性证据尚未得到确凿证实,这让人质疑它是否能有效应对威胁。其次,学校关闭有可能造成严重的不良后果,而这些后果将对弱势群体产生不成比例的影响。因此,政策制定者应专注于收集更多关于学校关闭有效性的证据,并加强对他们决定采用的任何学校关闭计划的优缺点的沟通与透明度。政策制定者还应考虑中间选项,如部分学校关闭,这可能提供一些方法来收获学校关闭的许多好处,同时将成本降至最低。最后,政策制定者必须努力确保任何干预措施的利益和负担得到公平分配。