Suppr超能文献

外科重症监护病房中的脂多糖结合蛋白:脓毒症的标志物?

Lipopolysaccharide binding protein in a surgical intensive care unit: a marker of sepsis?

作者信息

Sakr Yasser, Burgett Ulricke, Nacul Flavio E, Reinhart Konrad, Brunkhorst Frank

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Friedrich-Schiller-University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2014-22. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817b86e3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the time course of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) plasma concentrations in patients in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU), their value in discriminating sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and their association with severity of sepsis and outcome in these patients compared with interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, cohort study.

SETTING

Academic ICU.

PATIENTS

All 327 consecutively admitted patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Serum LBP concentrations were higher in patients who had severe sepsis/septic shock on ICU admission than in patients who never had sepsis (20.5 [8.1-38.8] vs. 14.2 [7.7-22.2] microg/mL, p < .05) but were similar in patients with sepsis without organ failure and those who never had sepsis. After 3 days, LBP levels were similar in all groups. In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, LBP concentrations moderately discriminated sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (area under curve [AUC] = .66) and severe sepsis from sepsis without organ failure (AUC = .71). IL-6 had the highest AUC in discriminating sepsis from other conditions (AUC = .76) and procalcitonin had the highest AUC for discrimination of severe sepsis from sepsis (AUC = .86). LBP concentrations on admission and during the first week were similar in patients with gram-positive and those with gram-negative infections (15.9 [11-26.7] and 37.2 [25.1-62.4] vs. 16.3 [5.3-31.6] and 31.6 [13.4], microg/mL, p > .2). LBP concentrations on admission were similar in nonsurvivors and survivors and did not discriminate ICU mortality. However, the maximum LBP concentration during the first 3 days in the ICU discriminated moderately between survivors and nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the surgical ICU, LBP moderately discriminated patients without infection from patients with severe sepsis but not from patients with sepsis without organ dysfunction. LBP concentrations did not distinguish between gram-positive and gram-negative infections. The correlation of LBP concentrations with disease severity and outcome is weak compared with other markers and its use as a biomarker is not warranted in this patient population.

摘要

目的

我们研究了外科重症监护病房(ICU)患者血浆中脂多糖结合蛋白(LBP)浓度的时间变化过程,其在区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征方面的价值,以及与白细胞介素(IL)-6、C反应蛋白和降钙素原相比,其与这些患者脓毒症严重程度及预后的相关性。

设计

前瞻性观察队列研究。

地点

学术性ICU。

患者

327例连续入院患者。

测量与主要结果

入住ICU时患有严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克的患者血清LBP浓度高于从未患过脓毒症的患者(20.5[8.1 - 38.8]对14.2[7.7 - 22.2]μg/mL,p <.05),但无器官功能衰竭的脓毒症患者与从未患过脓毒症的患者血清LBP浓度相似。3天后,所有组的LBP水平相似。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,LBP浓度能适度区分脓毒症与全身炎症反应综合征(曲线下面积[AUC]=.66)以及严重脓毒症与无器官功能衰竭的脓毒症(AUC =.71)。IL-6在区分脓毒症与其他情况时AUC最高(AUC =.76),而降钙素原在区分严重脓毒症与脓毒症时AUC最高(AUC =.86)。革兰阳性菌感染患者和革兰阴性菌感染患者入院时及第一周的LBP浓度相似(15.9[11 - 26.7]和37.2[25.1 - 62.4]对16.3[5.3 - 31.6]和31.6[13.4]μg/mL,p >.2)。非幸存者和幸存者入院时的LBP浓度相似,且无法区分ICU死亡率。然而,ICU前3天内LBP的最高浓度能适度区分幸存者和非幸存者。

结论

在外科ICU中,LBP能适度区分无感染患者与严重脓毒症患者,但不能区分无器官功能障碍的脓毒症患者。LBP浓度无法区分革兰阳性菌和革兰阴性菌感染。与其他标志物相比,LBP浓度与疾病严重程度及预后的相关性较弱,在该患者群体中不建议将其用作生物标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验