Suppr超能文献

温水擦浴加安乃近与单用安乃近降低发热儿童体温的比较

Tepid sponging plus dipyrone versus dipyrone alone for reducing body temperature in febrile children.

作者信息

Alves João Guilherme Bezerra, Almeida Natália Dornelas Câmara Marques de, Almeida Camila Dornelas Câmara Marques de

机构信息

Instituto Materno Infantil Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2008 Mar 6;126(2):107-11. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802008000200008.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

The role of tepid sponging to promote fever control in children is controversial. We did not find any studies reporting on the effectiveness of tepid sponging in addition to dipyrone. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of tepid sponging plus dipyrone with dipyrone alone for reducing fever.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A randomized clinical trial was undertaken at Instituto Materno-Infantil Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco.

METHODS

Children from six months to five years old with axillary temperature greater than 38 masculineC in the emergency ward between January and July 2006 were eligible. One hundred and twenty children were randomly assigned to receive oral dipyrone (20 mg/kg) or oral dipyrone and tepid sponging for 15 minutes. The primary outcome was mean temperature reduction after 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Secondary outcomes were crying and irritability.

RESULTS

106 children finished the study. After the first 15 minutes, the fall in axillary temperature was significantly greater in the sponged group than in the control group (p < 0.001). From 30 to 120 minutes, better fever control was observed in the control group. Crying and irritability were observed respectively in 52% and 36% of the sponged children and in none and only two of the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Tepid sponging plus dipyrone cooled faster during the first 15 minutes, but dipyrone alone presented better fever control over the two-hour period. Tepid sponging caused mild discomfort, crying and irritability for most of the children.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12608000083392.

摘要

背景与目的

温水擦浴在促进儿童退热方面的作用存在争议。我们未找到任何关于除安乃近外温水擦浴有效性的研究报告。本研究旨在比较温水擦浴加安乃近与单用安乃近在退热方面的效果。

设计与地点

在伯南布哥州累西腓市的费尔南多·菲盖拉妇幼研究所进行了一项随机临床试验。

方法

纳入2006年1月至7月在急诊病房腋温高于38℃的6个月至5岁儿童。120名儿童被随机分配接受口服安乃近(20mg/kg)或口服安乃近并温水擦浴15分钟。主要结局是15、30、60、90和120分钟后的平均体温下降情况。次要结局是哭闹和烦躁。

结果

106名儿童完成了研究。最初15分钟后,擦浴组的腋温下降明显大于对照组(p<0.001)。30至120分钟期间,对照组的退热效果更好。擦浴儿童中分别有52%和36%出现哭闹和烦躁,而对照组无一例出现,仅两例有轻微表现。

结论

温水擦浴加安乃近在最初15分钟降温更快,但单用安乃近在两小时内的退热效果更好。温水擦浴使大多数儿童出现轻度不适、哭闹和烦躁。

临床试验注册号

ACTRN12608000083392。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c779/11026025/582618338500/1806-9460-spmj-126-02-107-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验