Andersson Manne, Andersson Roland E
Department of Surgery, County Hospital Ryhov, 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden.
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
The clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is a subjective synthesis of information from variables with ill-defined diagnostic value. This process could be improved by using a scoring system that includes objective variables that reflect the inflammatory response. This study describes the construction and evaluation of a new clinical appendicitis score.
Data were collected prospectively from 545 patients admitted for suspected appendicitis at four hospitals. The score was constructed from eight variables with independent diagnostic value (right-lower-quadrant pain, rebound tenderness, muscular defense, WBC count, proportion neutrophils, CRP, body temperature, and vomiting) in 316 randomly selected patients and evaluated on the remaining 229 patients. Ordered logistic regression was used to obtain a high discriminating power with focus on advanced appendicitis. Diagnostic performance was compared with the Alvarado score.
The ROC area of the new score was 0.97 for advanced appendicitis and 0.93 for all appendicitis compared with 0.92 (p = 0.0027) and 0.88 (p = 0.0007), respectively, for the Alvarado score. Sixty-three percent of the patients were classified into the low- or high-probability group with an accuracy of 97.2%, leaving 37% for further investigation. Seventy-three percent of the nonappendicitis patients, 67% of the advanced appendicitis, and 37% of all appendicitis patients were correctly classified into the low- and high-probability zone, respectively.
This simple clinical score can correctly classify the majority of patients with suspected appendicitis, leaving the need for diagnostic imaging or diagnostic laparoscopy to the smaller group of patients with an indeterminate scoring result.
阑尾炎的临床诊断是对具有不明确诊断价值的变量信息进行主观综合。使用包含反映炎症反应的客观变量的评分系统可改善这一过程。本研究描述了一种新的临床阑尾炎评分的构建与评估。
前瞻性收集了四家医院545例因疑似阑尾炎入院患者的数据。该评分由316例随机选择患者中的八个具有独立诊断价值的变量(右下象限疼痛、反跳痛、肌紧张、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例、C反应蛋白、体温和呕吐)构建而成,并在其余229例患者中进行评估。采用有序逻辑回归以获得高鉴别力,重点关注进展期阑尾炎。将诊断性能与阿尔瓦拉多评分进行比较。
新评分对进展期阑尾炎的ROC曲线下面积为0.97,对所有阑尾炎为0.93,而阿尔瓦拉多评分分别为0.92(p = 0.0027)和0.88(p = 0.0007)。63%的患者被分类为低概率或高概率组,准确率为97.2%,其余37%的患者需进一步检查。分别有73%的非阑尾炎患者、67%的进展期阑尾炎患者和37%的所有阑尾炎患者被正确分类到低概率和高概率区域。
这种简单的临床评分可正确分类大多数疑似阑尾炎患者,对于评分结果不确定的较小患者群体,仍需进行诊断性影像学检查或诊断性腹腔镜检查。