• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾炎炎症反应评分:一种用于诊断急性阑尾炎的工具,其性能优于阿尔瓦拉多评分。

The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score.

作者信息

Andersson Manne, Andersson Roland E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, County Hospital Ryhov, 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y
PMID:18553045
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical diagnosis of appendicitis is a subjective synthesis of information from variables with ill-defined diagnostic value. This process could be improved by using a scoring system that includes objective variables that reflect the inflammatory response. This study describes the construction and evaluation of a new clinical appendicitis score.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively from 545 patients admitted for suspected appendicitis at four hospitals. The score was constructed from eight variables with independent diagnostic value (right-lower-quadrant pain, rebound tenderness, muscular defense, WBC count, proportion neutrophils, CRP, body temperature, and vomiting) in 316 randomly selected patients and evaluated on the remaining 229 patients. Ordered logistic regression was used to obtain a high discriminating power with focus on advanced appendicitis. Diagnostic performance was compared with the Alvarado score.

RESULTS

The ROC area of the new score was 0.97 for advanced appendicitis and 0.93 for all appendicitis compared with 0.92 (p = 0.0027) and 0.88 (p = 0.0007), respectively, for the Alvarado score. Sixty-three percent of the patients were classified into the low- or high-probability group with an accuracy of 97.2%, leaving 37% for further investigation. Seventy-three percent of the nonappendicitis patients, 67% of the advanced appendicitis, and 37% of all appendicitis patients were correctly classified into the low- and high-probability zone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This simple clinical score can correctly classify the majority of patients with suspected appendicitis, leaving the need for diagnostic imaging or diagnostic laparoscopy to the smaller group of patients with an indeterminate scoring result.

摘要

背景

阑尾炎的临床诊断是对具有不明确诊断价值的变量信息进行主观综合。使用包含反映炎症反应的客观变量的评分系统可改善这一过程。本研究描述了一种新的临床阑尾炎评分的构建与评估。

方法

前瞻性收集了四家医院545例因疑似阑尾炎入院患者的数据。该评分由316例随机选择患者中的八个具有独立诊断价值的变量(右下象限疼痛、反跳痛、肌紧张、白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例、C反应蛋白、体温和呕吐)构建而成,并在其余229例患者中进行评估。采用有序逻辑回归以获得高鉴别力,重点关注进展期阑尾炎。将诊断性能与阿尔瓦拉多评分进行比较。

结果

新评分对进展期阑尾炎的ROC曲线下面积为0.97,对所有阑尾炎为0.93,而阿尔瓦拉多评分分别为0.92(p = 0.0027)和0.88(p = 0.0007)。63%的患者被分类为低概率或高概率组,准确率为97.2%,其余37%的患者需进一步检查。分别有73%的非阑尾炎患者、67%的进展期阑尾炎患者和37%的所有阑尾炎患者被正确分类到低概率和高概率区域。

结论

这种简单的临床评分可正确分类大多数疑似阑尾炎患者,对于评分结果不确定的较小患者群体,仍需进行诊断性影像学检查或诊断性腹腔镜检查。

相似文献

1
The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score.阑尾炎炎症反应评分:一种用于诊断急性阑尾炎的工具,其性能优于阿尔瓦拉多评分。
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
2
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
3
External validation of Lintula score in Turkish acute appendicitis patients.林图拉评分在土耳其急性阑尾炎患者中的外部验证。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
4
A comparison between modified Alvarado score and RIPASA score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.改良阿尔瓦拉多评分与RIPASA评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较。
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):351-355. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0381-0. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Impact of the Alvarado score on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparing clinical judgment, Alvarado score, and a new modified score in suspected appendicitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.阿尔瓦拉多评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的影响:在疑似阑尾炎中比较临床判断、阿尔瓦拉多评分及一种新的改良评分:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Aug;28(8):2398-405. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3488-8. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
6
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的评估
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2008;55(1):55-61. doi: 10.2298/aci0801055s.
7
Evaluation of scoring systems in predicting acute appendicitis in children.评估评分系统在预测儿童急性阑尾炎中的作用。
Surgery. 2016 Dec;160(6):1599-1604. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
8
MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN CHILDREN WITH DIAGNOSIS OF APPENDICITIS.诊断为阑尾炎的儿童的改良阿尔瓦拉多评分
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):51-52. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010014.
9
Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by comparing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score and clinical impression of surgeons.通过比较血清C反应蛋白测量值、阿尔瓦拉多评分和外科医生的临床印象来诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Mar;87(3):296-303.
10
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of plasma markers for early diagnosis in patients suspected for acute appendicitis.评价用于疑似急性阑尾炎患者早期诊断的血浆标志物的诊断准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):703-10. doi: 10.1111/acem.12160.

引用本文的文献

1
Complicated appendicitis: value of inflammatory markers based on EAES 2015 guidelines.复杂性阑尾炎:基于2015年欧洲急诊外科学会(EAES)指南的炎症标志物价值
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12038-z.
2
Determining Surgeon's Accuracy in Predicting the Severity of Appendicitis in Children: A Comparison Between Clinical Diagnosis and Intraoperative Findings.确定外科医生预测儿童阑尾炎严重程度的准确性:临床诊断与术中发现的比较
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jul-Aug;30(4):469-476. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_248_24. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
3
Validation and Comparison of Pediatric Appendicitis Scores and Management Strategies (Project SPASMS): Protocol for a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.
小儿阑尾炎评分与管理策略的验证与比较(SPASMS项目):一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 27;14:e67941. doi: 10.2196/67941.
4
Novel Biomarkers for Improving the Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Pediatric Patients.用于改善小儿阑尾炎诊断的新型生物标志物
J Clin Lab Anal. 2025 Jun;39(12):e70048. doi: 10.1002/jcla.70048. Epub 2025 May 3.
5
Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children.瑞典成人及儿童急性阑尾炎诊断与管理国家指南。
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae165.
6
Predictive Factors of Acute Appendicitis and Its Outcomes Among the Pediatric Age Group.儿童急性阑尾炎的预测因素及其预后
Cureus. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):e77925. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77925. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Diagnostic value of the appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score. A systematic review and meta-analysis.阑尾炎炎症反应(AIR)评分的诊断价值:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 8;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00582-x.
8
Acute appendicitis and its treatment: a historical overview.急性阑尾炎及其治疗:历史概述。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan 30;40(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04793-7.
9
Non-linear association between C-reactive protein levels and length of stay in pediatric appendicitis patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的小儿阑尾炎患者中,C反应蛋白水平与住院时间之间的非线性关联。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Dec 12;12:1464193. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1464193. eCollection 2024.
10
Machine-learning based prediction of appendicitis for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department.基于机器学习对急诊科急性腹痛患者阑尾炎的预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec 23;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00570-7.