Singla Anand, Singla Satpaul, Singh Mohinder, Singla Deeksha
Department of Surgery, G.M.C., Patiala, 147001, Punjab, India.
, F-6, Tej Bagh Colony, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):351-355. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0381-0. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
Acute appendicitis is a common but elusive surgical condition and remains a diagnostic dilemma. It has many clinical mimickers and diagnosis is primarily made on clinical grounds, leading to the evolution of clinical scoring systems for pin pointing the right diagnosis. The modified Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems are two important scoring systems, for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. We prospectively compared the two scoring systems for diagnosing acute appendicitis in 50 patients presenting with right iliac fossa pain. The RIPASA score correctly classified 88 % of patients with histologically confirmed acute appendicitis compared with 48.0 % with modified Alvarado score, indicating that RIPASA score is more superior to Modified Alvarado score in our clinical settings.
急性阑尾炎是一种常见但难以捉摸的外科病症,仍然是一个诊断难题。它有许多临床模拟病症,诊断主要基于临床依据,这导致了用于精准诊断的临床评分系统的发展。改良的阿尔瓦拉多(Alvarado)评分系统和RIPASA评分系统是用于诊断急性阑尾炎的两个重要评分系统。我们前瞻性地比较了这两种评分系统在50例表现为右下腹疼痛患者中诊断急性阑尾炎的情况。RIPASA评分正确分类了88%经组织学证实为急性阑尾炎的患者,而改良阿尔瓦拉多评分为48.0%,这表明在我们的临床环境中,RIPASA评分比改良阿尔瓦拉多评分更具优势。