de Oliveira Alvares L, Pasqualini Genro B, Diehl F, Molina V A, Quillfeldt J A
Departamento de Biofísica, Laboratório de Psicobiologia e Neurocomputação, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Neuroscience. 2008 Jul 17;154(4):1648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 May 10.
Retrieval of a consolidated memory triggers a number of processes which depend, among other factors, on the duration of the reactivation session: reconsolidation requires a brief reactivation session, and extinction, a prolonged one. The scope of this study is to explore the potential role of the hippocampal endocannabinoid system on reconsolidation and extinction processes. Bilateral infusion of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251) into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus of Wistar rats after memory reactivation facilitated the reconsolidation of the contextual fear conditioning memory. The inhibition of protein synthesis with DRB in the same brain region blocked memory reconsolidation. Both effects were persistent, lasting up to 7 days after the first retrieval experience. In contrast, the local infusion of anandamide blocked memory reconsolidation, an effect that was antagonized by the combined administration of anandamide with a subthreshold dose of a CB1 antagonist, supporting a CB1-mediated role of the hippocampal endocannabinoid system in the modulation of the memory reconsolidation. Local infusion of AM251 into CA1 blocked memory extinction whereas the administration of anandamide facilitated it; however, when combined with a subthreshold concentration of the CB1 antagonist, anandamide did not affect the extinction process. The clear-cut, opposite effects observed in each situation suggest a possible role of the hippocampal endocannabinoid system as a switching mechanism deciding which processes will take place, either maintaining the original memory (reconsolidation) or promoting a new learning (extinction).
巩固记忆的提取会引发一系列过程,这些过程除其他因素外,还取决于重新激活阶段的时长:重新巩固需要短暂的重新激活阶段,而消退则需要较长的重新激活阶段。本研究的目的是探讨海马内源性大麻素系统在重新巩固和消退过程中的潜在作用。在记忆重新激活后,将CB1大麻素受体拮抗剂N-(哌啶-1-基)-5-(4-碘苯基)-1-(2,4-二氯苯基)-4-甲基-1H-吡唑-3-甲酰胺(AM251)双侧注入Wistar大鼠背侧海马的CA1区,促进了情境恐惧条件反射记忆的重新巩固。在同一脑区用DRB抑制蛋白质合成可阻断记忆重新巩固。这两种效应都是持久的,在首次提取经历后可持续长达7天。相比之下,局部注入花生四烯乙醇胺可阻断记忆重新巩固,花生四烯乙醇胺与阈下剂量的CB1拮抗剂联合给药可拮抗这一效应,支持海马内源性大麻素系统在调节记忆重新巩固中由CB1介导的作用。向CA1区局部注入AM251可阻断记忆消退,而注入花生四烯乙醇胺则促进记忆消退;然而,当与阈下浓度的CB1拮抗剂联合使用时,花生四烯乙醇胺不影响消退过程。在每种情况下观察到的明确相反的效应表明,海马内源性大麻素系统可能作为一种转换机制,决定发生哪些过程,是维持原始记忆(重新巩固)还是促进新的学习(消退)。