Bayer Hugo, Bertoglio Leandro J, Maren Stephen, Stern Cristina A J
Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology and Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Departamento de Farmacologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Jul;174:106198. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106198. Epub 2025 May 10.
Retrieval can bring memories to a labile state, creating a window to modify its content during reconsolidation. Numerous studies have investigated this period to elucidate reconsolidation mechanisms, understand long-term memory persistence, and develop therapeutic strategies for memory-related psychiatric disorders. However, the temporal dynamics of post-retrieval memory processes have been largely overlooked, leading to mixed findings and hindering the development of targeted interventions. This review discusses retrieval-related cellular and molecular events and how they develop in series and parallel across time. Emerging evidence suggests that some mechanisms triggered after fear memory retrieval can influence either reconsolidation or persistence in different time windows. The temporal boundaries of these post-retrieval processes are still unclear. Further research integrating behavioral and molecular approaches to a deeper understanding of reconsolidation and persistence temporal dynamics is essential to address current debates, including which system/pathway offers the most effective therapeutic window of opportunity.
记忆提取可使记忆进入不稳定状态,从而创造一个在重新巩固过程中修改其内容的窗口。众多研究对这一时期进行了调查,以阐明重新巩固机制、理解长期记忆的持久性,并为与记忆相关的精神疾病制定治疗策略。然而,提取后记忆过程的时间动态在很大程度上被忽视了,这导致了研究结果的不一致,并阻碍了有针对性干预措施的发展。本综述讨论了与提取相关的细胞和分子事件,以及它们如何随时间串联和平行发展。新出现的证据表明,恐惧记忆提取后触发的一些机制可在不同的时间窗口影响重新巩固或持久性。这些提取后过程的时间界限仍不清楚。进一步整合行为和分子方法的研究,以更深入地理解重新巩固和持久性的时间动态,对于解决当前的争论至关重要,包括哪个系统/途径提供了最有效的治疗时机窗口。