Frye Victoria, Galea Sandro, Tracy Melissa, Bucciarelli Angela, Putnam Sara, Wilt Susan
Center for Urban Epidemiologic Studies, New York Academy of Medicine, 1216 Fifth Ave, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1473-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.112813. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
We evaluated the contribution of neighborhood-level factors indicative of social disorganization, including educational and occupational attainment, immigrant concentration, physical disorder, and social cohesion, to the likelihood of intimate partner femicide (IPF) while taking into account known neighborhood- and individual-level IPF risk factors.
We used medical examiner data on 1861 femicide victims between 1990 and 1999 and archival information on 59 neighborhoods in New York City to conduct a multilevel case-control analysis.
After controlling for neighborhood-level income, we found that no neighborhood factors were significantly associated with IPF risk, as compared with risk of non-IPF and risk of femicide from unknown perpetrators, above and beyond the contributions of individual-level factors. The strongest predictors of IPF were foreign country of birth and young age.
IPF victims were nearly twice as likely as non-IPF victims to be foreign born; by contrast, there was little neighborhood-level heterogeneity with respect to IPF risk. Further research is needed to identify neighborhood characteristics that uniquely influence risk of IPF to guide community-level interventions.
我们评估了反映社会失序的邻里层面因素,包括教育和职业成就、移民集中度、物质失序和社会凝聚力,对亲密伴侣杀妻(IPF)可能性的影响,同时考虑了已知的邻里层面和个人层面的IPF风险因素。
我们使用了1990年至1999年间1861名杀妻受害者的法医数据以及纽约市59个社区的档案信息,进行了多层次病例对照分析。
在控制了邻里层面的收入后,我们发现,与非IPF风险以及不明凶手杀妻风险相比,在个体层面因素的贡献之外,没有邻里因素与IPF风险显著相关。IPF的最强预测因素是出生国和年轻。
IPF受害者出生在国外的可能性几乎是非IPF受害者的两倍;相比之下,IPF风险在邻里层面几乎没有异质性。需要进一步研究以确定独特影响IPF风险的邻里特征,以指导社区层面的干预措施。