Suppr超能文献

经验对胶囊内镜检查中息肉检测及大小测量准确性的影响:来自动物模型研究对培训的启示

The impact of experience on polyp detection and sizing accuracy at capsule endoscopy: implications for training from an animal model study.

作者信息

Postgate A, Tekkis P, Fitzpatrick A, Bassett P, Fraser C

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2008 Jun;40(6):496-501. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995590.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Indications for capsule endoscopy include polyp surveillance in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and potentially colorectal examination and bowel cancer screening. The ability to detect and accurately size polyps associated with these conditions is critical when deciding which patients require further investigation or therapy. Inexperience may affect the ability of capsule endoscopists to perform these skills resulting in sub-optimal patient care. We assessed the performance of volunteers with different levels of endoscopy and capsule endoscopy experience using an animal-based polyp model.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six artificial polyps were sewn onto the luminal surface of porcine small bowel through which a capsule was propelled. Video images generated by the capsule were then shown to five expert capsule endoscopists, seven consultant gastroenterologists, seven trainee gastroenterologists, six endoscopy nurses, six gastrointestinal radiologists, and six nonmedical participants. Polyp detection rates and sizing accuracy were calculated according to each group and compared.

RESULTS

Expert capsule endoscopists had the highest polyp detection rate (91%) but only noncapsule endoscopy experience was independently correlated with improved polyp detection and sizing accuracy (OR missing polyp--endoscopy experience 1.0, no experience 1.96 [95% CI 1.29 - 2.97], P = 0.002; ratio of estimated to actual size--endoscopy experience 1.0, no experience 1.43 [95% CI 1.22 - 1.66], P < 0.001). Both expert capsule endoscopists and experienced endoscopists tended to underestimate polyp size more than novices, particularly for large polyps (OR capsule expert to non-expert: 2.39 vs. 1.0 [95% CI 1.73 - 3.29], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Polyp detection rates and sizing accuracy during capsule endoscopy improve with endoscopic experience. However large polyps, which are the most clinically relevant, are least-accurately sized, and capsule endoscopy experts and experienced endoscopists are the most likely to underestimate the size of these polyps. Training to improve performance in these measures for capsule endoscopy novices as well as experts is required.

摘要

背景与研究目的

胶囊内镜检查的适应证包括对佩吉特-耶格综合征(Peutz-Jeghers syndrome)患者的息肉监测,以及可能的结直肠检查和肠癌筛查。在决定哪些患者需要进一步检查或治疗时,检测并准确测量与这些病症相关息肉的能力至关重要。经验不足可能会影响胶囊内镜检查医师执行这些技能的能力,从而导致患者护理欠佳。我们使用基于动物的息肉模型评估了具有不同内镜检查和胶囊内镜检查经验水平的志愿者的表现。

患者与方法

将36个人造息肉缝在猪小肠的腔内表面,然后推动胶囊通过小肠。随后将胶囊生成的视频图像展示给5名胶囊内镜检查专家、7名胃肠病学顾问、7名胃肠病学实习医生、6名内镜护士、6名胃肠放射科医生和6名非医学参与者。根据每组情况计算息肉检出率和大小测量准确性,并进行比较。

结果

胶囊内镜检查专家的息肉检出率最高(91%),但只有非胶囊内镜检查经验与息肉检出率及大小测量准确性的提高独立相关(漏诊息肉的比值比——内镜检查经验:有经验者为1.0,无经验者为1.96[95%可信区间1.29 - 2.97],P = 0.002;估计大小与实际大小的比值——内镜检查经验:有经验者为1.0,无经验者为1.43[95%可信区间1.22 - 1.66],P < 0.001)。与新手相比,胶囊内镜检查专家和有经验的内镜医生往往更倾向于低估息肉大小,尤其是对于大息肉(胶囊内镜专家与非专家的比值比:2.39对1.0[95%可信区间1.73 - 3.29],P < 0.001)。

结论

胶囊内镜检查期间的息肉检出率和大小测量准确性会随着内镜检查经验的增加而提高。然而,临床上最相关的大息肉,其大小测量最不准确,而且胶囊内镜检查专家和有经验的内镜医生最有可能低估这些息肉的大小。需要对胶囊内镜检查新手和专家进行培训,以提高他们在这些测量方面的表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验