Suppr超能文献

专家使用虚拟内镜、视觉或圈套估计对结直肠息肉大小进行评估:一项基于视频的前瞻性研究。

Expert endoscopist assessment of colorectal polyp size using virtual scale endoscopy, visual or snare-based estimation: a prospective video-based study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 May;59(5):608-614. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2308519. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy has an impact on clinical decision-making. A laser-based virtual scale endoscope (VSE) is available to allow measuring polyp size using a virtual adaptive scale. This study evaluates video-based polyp size measurement accuracy among expert endoscopists using either VSE or visual assessment (VA) with either snare as reference size or without any reference size information.

METHODS

A prospective, video-based study was conducted with 10 expert endoscopists. Video sequences from 90 polyps with known reference size (fresh specimen measured using calipers) were distributed on three different slide sets so that each slide set showed the same polyp only once with either VSE, VA or snare-based information. A slide set was randomly assigned to each endoscopist. Endoscopists were asked to provide size estimation based on video review.

RESULTS

Relative accuracies for VSE, VA, and snare-based estimation were 75.1% (95% CI [71.6-78.5]), 65.0% (95% CI [59.5-70.4]) and 62.0% (95% CI [54.8-69.0]), respectively. VSE yielded significantly higher relative accuracy compared to VA ( = 0.002) and to snare ( = 0.001). A significantly lower percentage of polyps 1-5 mm were misclassified as >5 mm using VSE versus VA and snare (6.52% vs. 19.6% and 17.5%,  = 0.004) and a significantly lower percentage of polyps >5 mm were misclassified as 1-5 mm using VSE versus VA and snare (11.4% vs. 31.9% and 14.9%,  = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopists estimate polyp size with the highest accuracy when virtual adaptive scale information is displayed. Using a snare to assist sizing did not improve measurement accuracy compared to displaying visual information alone.

摘要

背景与目的

在结肠镜检查中准确估计息肉大小会影响临床决策。现已有一种基于激光的虚拟比例尺内窥镜(VSE),可使用虚拟自适应比例尺进行息肉大小测量。本研究评估了专家内镜医生使用 VSE 或视觉评估(VA),结合圈套器作为参考大小或不提供任何参考大小信息,进行视频测量息肉大小的准确性。

方法

前瞻性、基于视频的研究纳入了 10 名专家内镜医生。将 90 个已知参考大小(使用卡尺在新鲜标本上测量)的息肉的视频序列分配到三个不同的幻灯片集中,使得每个幻灯片集中仅显示一次相同的息肉,分别使用 VSE、VA 或圈套器信息。每个幻灯片集随机分配给一名内镜医生。要求内镜医生根据视频回顾提供大小估计。

结果

VSE、VA 和圈套器大小估计的相对准确性分别为 75.1%(95%可信区间[71.6-78.5])、65.0%(95%可信区间[59.5-70.4])和 62.0%(95%可信区间[54.8-69.0])。VSE 与 VA( = 0.002)和圈套器( = 0.001)相比,具有更高的相对准确性。与 VA 和圈套器相比,VSE 将 1-5mm 的息肉错误分类为 >5mm 的比例明显更低(6.52%比 19.6%和 17.5%, = 0.004),将 >5mm 的息肉错误分类为 1-5mm 的比例明显更低(11.4%比 31.9%和 14.9%, = 0.038)。

结论

当显示虚拟自适应比例尺信息时,内镜医生估计息肉大小的准确性最高。与单独显示视觉信息相比,使用圈套器辅助测量大小并未提高测量准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验