• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status.使用同侪分组来评估县公共卫生状况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A93. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
2
Community health status indicators project: the development of a national approach to community health.社区健康状况指标项目:国家社区健康方法的制定。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A94. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
3
Health ranking of the largest US counties using the Community Health Status Indicators peer strata and database.使用社区健康状况指标同行阶层和数据库对美国最大县进行健康排名。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):401-5. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318205413c.
4
Community health status indicators: adding a geospatial component.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A96. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
5
Multi-criteria assessment of county public health capability disparities.县域公共卫生能力差距的多标准评估
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2009 Winter;32(3):238-58.
6
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among States and selected local areas - United States, 2010.对某些州和选定的地方卫生行为进行监测-美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 May 31;62(1):1-247.
7
Surveillance for certain health behaviors among states and selected local areas--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2011.对某些州和选定的地方区域的健康行为进行监测——美国 2011 年行为风险因素监测系统。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Oct 24;63(9):1-149.
8
Surveillance of certain health behaviors and conditions among states and selected local areas --- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2009.某些州和选定的地方卫生行为和状况监测---美国行为危险因素监测系统,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011 Aug 19;60(9):1-250.
9
Comparison of US County-Level Public Health Performance Rankings With County Cluster and National Rankings: Assessment Based on Prevalence Rates of Smoking and Obesity and Motor Vehicle Crash Death Rates.美国县一级公共卫生绩效排名与县聚类和全国排名的比较:基于吸烟和肥胖患病率以及机动车事故死亡率的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6816.
10
Surveillance for Certain Health Behaviors, Chronic Diseases, and Conditions, Access to Health Care, and Use of Preventive Health Services Among States and Selected Local Areas
- Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2012.国家和部分选定地区特定健康行为、慢性病及状况、卫生保健服务利用和预防保健服务的监测
- 美国 2012 年行为危险因素监测系统。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2016 Apr 29;65(4):1-142. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6504a1.

引用本文的文献

1
Rebuilding a US Federal Data Strategy After the End of the "Community Health Status Indicators".重建美国联邦数据战略:终结“社区健康状况指标”之后
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(10):1865-1873. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306437.
2
Protocol for a quasi-experimental, 950 county study examining implementation outcomes and mechanisms of Stepping Up, a national policy effort to improve mental health and substance use services for justice-involved individuals.一项准实验性、950 个县研究的方案,旨在研究“强化行动”的实施结果和机制,该行动是一项全国性政策努力,旨在改善涉及司法的个人的心理健康和物质使用服务。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 29;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01095-2.
3
Comparison of US County-Level Public Health Performance Rankings With County Cluster and National Rankings: Assessment Based on Prevalence Rates of Smoking and Obesity and Motor Vehicle Crash Death Rates.美国县一级公共卫生绩效排名与县聚类和全国排名的比较:基于吸烟和肥胖患病率以及机动车事故死亡率的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6816.
4
The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods.《县健康排名:原理与方法》
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Apr 17;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0044-2. eCollection 2015.
5
Community health status indicators project: the development of a national approach to community health.社区健康状况指标项目:国家社区健康方法的制定。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A94. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
6
Healthy behavior: the truth.健康行为:真相。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A72. Epub 2008 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Community health status indicators: adding a geospatial component.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A96. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
2
Public health services and systems research.公共卫生服务与系统研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):169-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.013.
3
The problems of relative deprivation: why some societies do better than others.相对剥夺问题:为何有些社会比其他社会表现更好。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1965-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.041. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
4
The case of Montréal's missing food deserts: evaluation of accessibility to food supermarkets.蒙特利尔消失的食物荒漠案例:食品超市可达性评估
Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Feb 12;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-4.
5
Local public health agency performance and community health status.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 Nov-Dec;12(6):522-7. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200611000-00004.
6
Defining urban and rural areas in U.S. epidemiologic studies.在美国流行病学研究中定义城乡地区。
J Urban Health. 2006 Mar;83(2):162-75. doi: 10.1007/s11524-005-9016-3.
7
Social and geographic distance in HIV risk.艾滋病病毒感染风险中的社会和地理距离
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Aug;32(8):506-12. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000161191.12026.ca.
8
The Missouri experience in providing tools and resources to promote community assessment.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2002 Jul;8(4):14-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200207000-00004.
9
Measuring contextual characteristics for community health.衡量社区健康的背景特征。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1645-717. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00198.x.
10
Comparing alternative methods for composing community peer groups: a data warehouse application.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001 Nov;7(6):87-95. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200107060-00010.

使用同侪分组来评估县公共卫生状况。

Use of peer groupings to assess county public health status.

作者信息

Kanarek Norma, Bialek Ron, Stanley Jennifer

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, 615 N Wolfe St, Room e7038, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A93. Epub 2008 Jun 15.

PMID:18558043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2483569/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Community Health Status Indicators Project was undertaken to produce county-specific reports assessing the status of community health for local jurisdictions throughout the United States. To accomplish this assessment, the Community Health Status Indicators Project team selected peer groupings of counties to monitor and analyze the health of local communities relative to peer communities.

METHODS

To identify peer counties, the project team used 5 categorical county demographic variables, a specified order for applying criteria, and a predetermined target for peer grouping size to subdivide counties into homogeneous subgroups called peer groupings.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight peer groupings were developed with 14-58 counties in each. The average size of each peer grouping was 35 counties. All peer groupings included counties representing at least 6 states.

DISCUSSION

Peer groupings are very useful for community health assessment. They convey the range of health status indicator values for similar counties, serve as a basis for expected numbers of reportable diseases, and provide a method for comparing communities with peer and U.S. medians. To maintain their usefulness, peer groupings must be updated periodically.

摘要

引言

社区健康状况指标项目旨在编制针对美国各县的报告,评估各地辖区的社区健康状况。为完成此项评估,社区健康状况指标项目团队挑选了县的对等分组,以监测和分析当地社区相对于对等社区的健康状况。

方法

为确定对等县,项目团队使用了5个分类县人口统计学变量、应用标准的特定顺序以及对等分组规模的预定目标,将各县细分为称为对等分组的同类子组。

结果

共形成了88个对等分组,每个分组中有14 - 58个县。每个对等分组的平均规模为35个县。所有对等分组均包含代表至少6个州的县。

讨论

对等分组对社区健康评估非常有用。它们传达了类似县的健康状况指标值范围,作为可报告疾病预期数量的基础,并提供了一种将社区与对等社区及美国中位数进行比较的方法。为保持其有用性,对等分组必须定期更新。