Hall Susan A, Kaufman Jay S, Ricketts Thomas C
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27709-3398, USA.
J Urban Health. 2006 Mar;83(2):162-75. doi: 10.1007/s11524-005-9016-3.
Among epidemiologists, there has been increasing interest in the characteristics of communities that influence health. In the United States, the rural health disparity has been a recent focus of attention and made a priority for improvement. While many standardized definitions of urban and rural exist and are used by social scientists and demographers, they are found in sources unfamiliar to health researchers and have largely not been used in public health studies. This paper briefly reviews some available definitions of urban and rural for American geographic subunits and their respective strengths and weaknesses. For example, some definitions are better suited than others for capturing access to health care services. The authors applied different definitions to breast cancer incidence rates to show how urban/rural rate ratio comparisons would vary by choice of definition and found that dichotomous definitions may fail to capture variability in very rural areas. Further study of the utility of these measures in health studies is warranted.
在流行病学家中,人们对影响健康的社区特征越来越感兴趣。在美国,农村地区的健康差距是近期关注的焦点,并被列为优先改善事项。虽然社会科学家和人口统计学家有许多关于城乡的标准化定义并在使用,但健康研究人员并不熟悉这些定义的出处,并且这些定义在很大程度上未被用于公共卫生研究。本文简要回顾了一些适用于美国地理子单元的城乡定义及其各自的优缺点。例如,一些定义比其他定义更适合用于衡量获得医疗保健服务的情况。作者将不同的定义应用于乳腺癌发病率,以展示城乡发病率比值的比较会如何因定义的选择而有所不同,并发现二分法定义可能无法捕捉非常偏远农村地区的变异性。有必要进一步研究这些指标在健康研究中的效用。