Estborn Lennart, Joelson Svante
Clinical Drug Safety, AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden.
Drug Saf. 2008;31(7):627-36. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831070-00008.
A potential causal association between an increase in gastric pH and a risk of community-acquired respiratory tract infection (RTI), specifically pneumonia, has been debated in relation to the use of potent gastric acid-suppressive medication.
To investigate the occurrence of community-acquired RTI, including pneumonia, in patients receiving esomeprazole versus placebo and other acid-suppressive agents in randomized clinical trials.
The AstraZeneca ARIADNE safety database was searched for comparative, controlled phase II-IV randomized, blinded clinical studies with esomeprazole and standard reporting of all adverse events (AEs). Pooled AE data were presented according to treatment comparison (esomeprazole versus placebo, esomeprazole 40 mg versus 20 mg daily, esomeprazole versus omeprazole, lansoprazole and/or ranitidine, respectively). Frequency and relative risk (RR), with 99% confidence interval (CI) and adjustment for time on treatment, were calculated for the following four AE categories: all RTIs; signs and symptoms potentially indicating RTI; lower RTI; and pneumonia.
Thirty-one studies were identified, in which 16 583 patients received esomeprazole and 12 044 patients received either placebo or comparator acid-suppressive drugs. The occurrence of all four categories of AEs was similar between esomeprazole and placebo (all RTIs: 9.2% versus 8.5%; signs and symptoms of RTI: 1.8% versus 1.8%; lower RTI: 1.6% versus 1.5%; and pneumonia: 0.2% in both groups). The RR estimates were as follows: all RTIs, 0.93 (99% CI 0.78, 1.11); signs and symptoms of RTI, 0.85 (99% CI 0.57, 1.27); lower RTI, 0.92 (99% CI 0.59, 1.42); and pneumonia, 0.94 (99% CI 0.29, 3.07). The distribution of RTIs by patient sex and age showed a similar pattern in esomeprazole and placebo-treated patients. The comparisons of esomeprazole with the other comparator acid-suppressive drugs showed a similar pattern with only minor numerical differences in the occurrence of RTI between the drugs. There were no significant between-group differences with esomeprazole versus placebo for all four categories of AEs according to esomeprazole dosage, treatment indication and duration of treatment.
This pooled analysis found no causal association between acid-suppressive therapy with esomeprazole and increased risk of community-acquired RTI, including pneumonia, in patients receiving this agent for gastric acid-related disorders.
强效胃酸抑制药物的使用引发了关于胃pH值升高与社区获得性呼吸道感染(RTI)尤其是肺炎风险之间潜在因果关联的讨论。
在随机临床试验中,研究接受埃索美拉唑治疗的患者与接受安慰剂及其他抑酸剂治疗的患者相比,社区获得性RTI(包括肺炎)的发生情况。
检索阿斯利康ARIADNE安全数据库,查找使用埃索美拉唑的比较性、对照II-IV期随机、盲法临床研究以及所有不良事件(AE)的标准报告。根据治疗比较(埃索美拉唑与安慰剂、埃索美拉唑每日40 mg与20 mg、埃索美拉唑分别与奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和/或雷尼替丁)呈现汇总的AE数据。计算以下四类AE的频率和相对风险(RR),99%置信区间(CI)并对治疗时间进行校正:所有RTI;可能提示RTI的体征和症状;下呼吸道RTI;以及肺炎。
共识别出31项研究,其中16583例患者接受埃索美拉唑治疗,12044例患者接受安慰剂或对照抑酸药物治疗。埃索美拉唑组和安慰剂组四类AE的发生率相似(所有RTI:9.2%对8.5%;RTI的体征和症状:1.8%对1.8%;下呼吸道RTI:1.6%对1.5%;肺炎:两组均为0.2%)。RR估计值如下:所有RTI,0.93(99%CI 0.78,1.11);RTI的体征和症状,0.85(99%CI 0.57,1.27);下呼吸道RTI,0.92(99%CI 0.59,1.42);肺炎,0.94(99%CI 0.29,3.07)。埃索美拉唑组和安慰剂组患者按性别和年龄分布的RTI情况相似。埃索美拉唑与其他对照抑酸药物的比较显示出相似模式,药物之间RTI发生率仅存在微小数值差异。根据埃索美拉唑剂量、治疗适应证和治疗持续时间,埃索美拉唑与安慰剂相比,四类AE在组间均无显著差异。
这项汇总分析发现,对于因胃酸相关疾病接受埃索美拉唑治疗的患者,使用埃索美拉唑进行抑酸治疗与社区获得性RTI(包括肺炎)风险增加之间无因果关联。