Suppr超能文献

抑酸药物的使用与肺炎风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2011 Feb 22;183(3):310-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.092129. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have yielded inconsistent findings about the association between the use of acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of pneumonia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize this association.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Embase and the Cochrane Library) from inception to Aug. 28, 2009. Two evaluators independently extracted data. Because of heterogeneity, we used random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of effect.

RESULTS

We identified 31 studies: five case-control studies, three cohort studies and 23 randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of the eight observational studies showed that the overall risk of pneumonia was higher among people using proton pump inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.46, I(2) 90.5%) and histamine(2) receptor antagonists (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.36, I(2) 0.0%). In the randomized controlled trials, use of histamine(2) receptor antagonists was associated with an elevated risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.48, I(2) 30.6%).

INTERPRETATION

Use of a proton pump inhibitor or histamine(2) receptor antagonist may be associated with an increased risk of both community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given these potential adverse effects, clinicians should use caution in prescribing acid-suppressive drugs for patients at risk.

摘要

背景

观察性研究和随机对照试验得出的关于抑酸药物使用与肺炎风险之间的关联的结果并不一致。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析以总结这一关联。

方法

我们从建库至 2009 年 8 月 28 日检索了三个电子数据库(MEDLINE [PubMed]、Embase 和 Cochrane Library)。两位评价员独立提取数据。由于存在异质性,我们采用随机效应荟萃分析来获得效应的合并估计值。

结果

我们确定了 31 项研究:5 项病例对照研究,3 项队列研究和 23 项随机对照试验。对 8 项观察性研究的荟萃分析显示,使用质子泵抑制剂(校正比值比 [OR] 1.27,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.11-1.46,I(2) 90.5%)和组胺(2)受体拮抗剂(校正 OR 1.22,95% CI 1.09-1.36,I(2) 0.0%)的人群肺炎总体风险更高。在随机对照试验中,组胺(2)受体拮抗剂的使用与医院获得性肺炎的风险增加相关(相对风险 1.22,95% CI 1.01-1.48,I(2) 30.6%)。

结论

质子泵抑制剂或组胺(2)受体拮抗剂的使用可能与社区获得性和医院获得性肺炎的风险增加相关。鉴于这些潜在的不良影响,临床医生在为有风险的患者开处方时应谨慎使用抑酸药物。

相似文献

5
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 21;11(11):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub3.
6
Antioxidants for female subfertility.用于女性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD007807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub3.
7
Proton pump inhibitors for functional dyspepsia.用于功能性消化不良的质子泵抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 8;3(3):CD011194. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011194.pub2.

引用本文的文献

6
GERD: Latest update on acid-suppressant drugs.胃食管反流病:抑酸药物的最新进展
Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discov. 2024 Aug 23;7:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2024.100198. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验