Trock Bruce J, Han Misop, Freedland Stephen J, Humphreys Elizabeth B, DeWeese Theodore L, Partin Alan W, Walsh Patrick C
Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, 546 Phipps Bldg, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
JAMA. 2008 Jun 18;299(23):2760-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.23.2760.
Biochemical disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy often prompts salvage radiotherapy, but no studies to date have had sufficient numbers of patients or follow-up to determine whether radiotherapy improves survival, and if so, the subgroup of men most likely to benefit.
To quantify the relative improvement in prostate cancer-specific survival of salvage radiotherapy vs no therapy after biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy, and to identify subgroups for whom salvage treatment is most beneficial.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 635 US men undergoing prostatectomy from 1982-2004, followed up through December 28, 2007, who experienced biochemical and/or local recurrence and received no salvage treatment (n = 397), salvage radiotherapy alone (n = 160), or salvage radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy (n = 78).
Prostate cancer-specific survival defined from time of recurrence until death from disease.
With a median follow-up of 6 years after recurrence and 9 years after prostatectomy, 116 men (18%) died from prostate cancer, including 89 (22%) who received no salvage treatment, 18 (11%) who received salvage radiotherapy alone, and 9 (12%) who received salvage radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Salvage radiotherapy alone was associated with a significant 3-fold increase in prostate cancer-specific survival relative to those who received no salvage treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.19-0.54]; P<.001). Addition of hormonal therapy to salvage radiotherapy was not associated with any additional increase in prostate cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.17-0.69]; P = .003). The increase in prostate cancer-specific survival associated with salvage radiotherapy was limited to men with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of less than 6 months and remained after adjustment for pathological stage and other established prognostic factors. Salvage radiotherapy initiated more than 2 years after recurrence provided no significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival. Men whose prostate-specific antigen level never became undetectable after salvage radiotherapy did not experience a significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival. Salvage radiotherapy also was associated with a significant increase in overall survival.
Salvage radiotherapy administered within 2 years of biochemical recurrence was associated with a significant increase in prostate cancer-specific survival among men with a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of less than 6 months, independent of other prognostic features such as pathological stage or Gleason score. These preliminary findings should be validated in other settings, and ultimately, in a randomized controlled trial.
根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的疾病通常促使采取挽救性放疗,但迄今为止尚无研究有足够数量的患者或随访时间来确定放疗是否能提高生存率,若能提高,哪些男性亚组最可能从中获益。
量化前列腺切除术后生化复发后挽救性放疗与未治疗相比在前列腺癌特异性生存方面的相对改善情况,并确定挽救性治疗最有益的亚组。
设计、研究地点和患者:对1982年至2004年在美国接受前列腺切除术的635名男性队列进行回顾性分析,随访至2007年12月28日,这些患者经历了生化和/或局部复发且未接受挽救性治疗(n = 397)、仅接受挽救性放疗(n = 160)或接受挽救性放疗联合激素治疗(n = 78)。
从复发时间到因疾病死亡定义的前列腺癌特异性生存。
复发后中位随访6年,前列腺切除术后中位随访9年,116名男性(18%)死于前列腺癌,其中89名(22%)未接受挽救性治疗,18名(11%)仅接受挽救性放疗,9名(12%)接受挽救性放疗和激素治疗。与未接受挽救性治疗的患者相比,仅挽救性放疗使前列腺癌特异性生存显著增加3倍(风险比[HR],0.32[95%置信区间{CI},0.19 - 0.54];P <.001)。在挽救性放疗基础上加用激素治疗未使前列腺癌特异性生存有任何额外增加(HR,0.34[95%CI,0.17 - 0.69];P = 0.003)。与挽救性放疗相关的前列腺癌特异性生存增加仅限于前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间小于6个月的男性,在调整病理分期和其他既定预后因素后仍然如此。复发后2年以上开始的挽救性放疗未使前列腺癌特异性生存显著增加。挽救性放疗后前列腺特异性抗原水平从未降至不可测的男性,其前列腺癌特异性生存未显著增加。挽救性放疗也与总生存显著增加相关。
在生化复发后2年内进行的挽救性放疗与前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间小于6个月的男性的前列腺癌特异性生存显著增加相关,独立于其他预后特征,如病理分期或 Gleason 评分。这些初步发现应在其他环境中得到验证,最终在随机对照试验中得到验证。