Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y
Clinical Trial Service Unit, Oxford, UK.
Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7.
In early breast cancer, variations in local treatment that substantially affect the risk of locoregional recurrence could also affect long-term breast cancer mortality. To examine this relationship, collaborative meta-analyses were undertaken, based on individual patient data, of the relevant randomised trials that began by 1995.
Information was available on 42,000 women in 78 randomised treatment comparisons (radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy, 23,500; more vs less surgery, 9300; more surgery vs radiotherapy, 9300). 24 types of local treatment comparison were identified. To help relate the effect on local (ie, locoregional) recurrence to that on breast cancer mortality, these were grouped according to whether or not the 5-year local recurrence risk exceeded 10% (<10%, 17,000 women; >10%, 25,000 women).
About three-quarters of the eventual local recurrence risk occurred during the first 5 years. In the comparisons that involved little (<10%) difference in 5-year local recurrence risk there was little difference in 15-year breast cancer mortality. Among the 25,000 women in the comparisons that involved substantial (>10%) differences, however, 5-year local recurrence risks were 7% active versus 26% control (absolute reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks were 44.6% versus 49.5% (absolute reduction 5.0%, SE 0.8, 2p<0.00001). These 25,000 women included 7300 with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in trials of radiotherapy (generally just to the conserved breast), with 5-year local recurrence risks (mainly in the conserved breast, as most had axillary clearance and node-negative disease) 7% versus 26% (reduction 19%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks 30.5% versus 35.9% (reduction 5.4%, SE 1.7, 2p=0.0002; overall mortality reduction 5.3%, SE 1.8, 2p=0.005). They also included 8500 with mastectomy, axillary clearance, and node-positive disease in trials of radiotherapy (generally to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes), with similar absolute gains from radiotherapy; 5-year local recurrence risks (mainly at these sites) 6% versus 23% (reduction 17%), and 15-year breast cancer mortality risks 54.7% versus 60.1% (reduction 5.4%, SE 1.3, 2p=0.0002; overall mortality reduction 4.4%, SE 1.2, 2p=0.0009). Radiotherapy produced similar proportional reductions in local recurrence in all women (irrespective of age or tumour characteristics) and in all major trials of radiotherapy versus not (recent or older; with or without systemic therapy), so large absolute reductions in local recurrence were seen only if the control risk was large. To help assess the life-threatening side-effects of radiotherapy, the trials of radiotherapy versus not were combined with those of radiotherapy versus more surgery. There was, at least with some of the older radiotherapy regimens, a significant excess incidence of contralateral breast cancer (rate ratio 1.18, SE 0.06, 2p=0.002) and a significant excess of non-breast-cancer mortality in irradiated women (rate ratio 1.12, SE 0.04, 2p=0.001). Both were slight during the first 5 years, but continued after year 15. The excess mortality was mainly from heart disease (rate ratio 1.27, SE 0.07, 2p=0.0001) and lung cancer (rate ratio 1.78, SE 0.22, 2p=0.0004).
In these trials, avoidance of a local recurrence in the conserved breast after BCS and avoidance of a local recurrence elsewhere (eg, the chest wall or regional nodes) after mastectomy were of comparable relevance to 15-year breast cancer mortality. Differences in local treatment that substantially affect local recurrence rates would, in the hypothetical absence of any other causes of death, avoid about one breast cancer death over the next 15 years for every four local recurrences avoided, and should reduce 15-year overall mortality.
在早期乳腺癌中,对局部复发风险有重大影响的局部治疗差异也可能影响乳腺癌的长期死亡率。为研究这种关系,我们基于个体患者数据,对1995年前开始的相关随机试验进行了协作荟萃分析。
在78项随机治疗比较中(放疗与不放疗,23500例;手术多与手术少,9300例;手术多与放疗,9300例),有42000名女性的信息可用。确定了24种局部治疗比较类型。为了将对局部(即区域)复发的影响与对乳腺癌死亡率的影响联系起来,根据5年局部复发风险是否超过10%(<10%,17000名女性;>10%,25000名女性)进行分组。
约四分之三的最终局部复发风险发生在头5年。在5年局部复发风险差异较小(<10%)的比较中,15年乳腺癌死亡率差异不大。然而,在涉及显著差异(>10%)的25000名女性的比较中,5年局部复发风险在积极治疗组为7%,对照组为26%(绝对降低19%),15年乳腺癌死亡风险为44.6%对49.5%(绝对降低5.0%,标准误0.8,P<0.00001)。这25000名女性中包括7300名在放疗试验中接受保乳手术(BCS)的患者(通常仅对保乳部位放疗),5年局部复发风险(主要在保乳部位,因为大多数患者进行了腋窝清扫且无淋巴结转移)为7%对26%(降低19%),15年乳腺癌死亡风险为30.5%对35.9%(降低5.4%,标准误1.7,P=0.0002;总体死亡率降低5.3%,标准误1.8,P=0.005)。她们还包括8500名在放疗试验中接受乳房切除术、腋窝清扫且有淋巴结转移的患者(通常对胸壁和区域淋巴结放疗),放疗带来的绝对获益相似;5年局部复发风险(主要在这些部位)为6%对23%(降低17%),15年乳腺癌死亡风险为54.7%对6%(降低5.4%,标准误1.3,P=0.0002;总体死亡率降低4.4%,标准误1.2,P=0.0009)。放疗在所有女性中(无论年龄或肿瘤特征如何)以及在所有放疗与不放疗的主要试验中(近期或早期;有无全身治疗)都使局部复发率按比例相似降低,因此只有当对照风险较大时,局部复发率才会有较大的绝对降低。为了评估放疗危及生命的副作用,将放疗与不放疗的试验与放疗与更多手术的试验合并。至少在一些较老的放疗方案中,对侧乳腺癌的发生率显著增加(率比1.18,标准误0.06,P=0.002),放疗女性中非乳腺癌死亡率也显著增加(率比1.12,标准误0,04,P=0.001)。两者在头5年都很轻微,但在15年后仍持续存在。额外的死亡率主要来自心脏病(率比1.27,标准误0.07,P=0.0001)和肺癌(率比1.78,标准误0.22,P=0.0004)。
在这些试验中,保乳手术后避免保乳部位的局部复发以及乳房切除术后避免其他部位(如胸壁或区域淋巴结)的局部复发与15年乳腺癌死亡率具有相当的相关性。在假设没有任何其他死亡原因的情况下,显著影响局部复发率的局部治疗差异在未来15年中每避免4次局部复发可避免约1例乳腺癌死亡,并应降低15年总体死亡率。