Baqui Abdullah H, Rosecrans Amanda M, Williams Emma K, Agrawal Praween K, Ahmed Saifuddin, Darmstadt Gary L, Kumar Vishwajeet, Kiran Usha, Panwar Dharmendra, Ahuja Ramesh C, Srivastava Vinod K, Black Robert E, Santosham Mathuram
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Suite E-8138, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Jul;23(4):234-43. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn012.
Socio-economic disparities in health have been well documented around the world. This study examines whether NGO facilitation of the government's community-based health programme improved the equity of maternal and newborn health in rural Uttar Pradesh, India. A quasi-experimental study design included one intervention district and one comparison district of rural Uttar Pradesh. A household survey conducted between January and June 2003 established baseline rates of programme coverage, maternal and newborn care practices, and health care utilization during 2001-02. An endline household survey was conducted after 30 months of programme implementation between January and March 2006 to measure the same indicators during 2004-05. The changes in the indicators from baseline to endline in the intervention and comparison districts were calculated by socio-economic quintiles, and concentration indices were constructed to measure the equity of programme indicators. The equity of programme coverage and antenatal and newborn care practices improved from baseline to endline in the intervention district while showing little change in the comparison district. Equity in health care utilization for mothers and newborns also showed some improvements in the intervention district, but notable socio-economic differentials remained, with the poor demonstrating less ability to access health services. NGO facilitation of government programmes is a feasible strategy to improve equity of maternal and neonatal health programmes. Improvements in equity were most pronounced for household practices, and inequities were still apparent in health care utilization. Furthermore, overall programme coverage remained low, limiting the ability to address equity. Programmes need to identify and address barriers to universal coverage and care utilization, particularly in the poorest segments of the population.
全球范围内,健康方面的社会经济差异已有充分记录。本研究探讨了非政府组织对印度北方邦农村地区政府社区健康项目的推动是否改善了孕产妇和新生儿健康的公平性。一项准实验研究设计纳入了北方邦农村地区的一个干预区和一个对照区。2003年1月至6月进行的一项家庭调查确定了2001 - 2002年期间项目覆盖的基线率、孕产妇和新生儿护理实践以及医疗保健利用情况。在2006年1月至3月项目实施30个月后进行了终期家庭调查,以测量2004 - 2005年期间的相同指标。干预区和对照区从基线到终期指标的变化按社会经济五分位数进行计算,并构建集中指数以衡量项目指标的公平性。干预区从基线到终期,项目覆盖以及产前和新生儿护理实践的公平性有所改善,而对照区变化不大。母亲和新生儿医疗保健利用的公平性在干预区也有一些改善,但显著的社会经济差异仍然存在,穷人获得医疗服务的能力较低。非政府组织对政府项目的推动是改善孕产妇和新生儿健康项目公平性的可行策略。家庭实践方面公平性的改善最为显著,而医疗保健利用方面的不公平现象仍然明显。此外,总体项目覆盖率仍然较低,限制了解决公平问题的能力。项目需要识别并解决普遍覆盖和医疗保健利用的障碍,特别是在最贫困人群中。