Patten Manus M, Haig David
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1389-94. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077651. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
We explore the theoretical consequences of limiting selection to males for the evolution of imprinted genes. We find that the efficiency of male-limited selection depends on the pattern of imprinting at an imprinted locus. When selection is strong, the maternally expressed pattern of imprinting allows faster genetic change than the reciprocal, paternally expressed pattern. When selection is relatively weak, the pattern of imprinting that permits a greater rate of genetic response to selection depends on the frequency of the favored allele: the paternally expressed pattern permits faster genetic change than does the maternally expressed pattern at low frequencies of a favored allele; at higher frequencies of a favored allele, however, the maternally expressed pattern is again more conducive to a genetic response. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical description of a difference between the two reciprocal patterns of imprinting. The selective efficiency bias we identify between the two patterns of imprinting has implications for natural and livestock populations, which we discuss.
我们探讨了将选择限制在雄性个体上对印记基因进化的理论影响。我们发现,雄性受限选择的效率取决于印记位点的印记模式。当选择强烈时,母源表达的印记模式比相反的父源表达模式能带来更快的基因变化。当选择相对较弱时,允许对选择产生更大遗传响应速率的印记模式取决于有利等位基因的频率:在有利等位基因频率较低时,父源表达模式比母源表达模式能带来更快的基因变化;然而,在有利等位基因频率较高时,母源表达模式再次更有利于产生遗传响应。据我们所知,这是对两种相反印记模式差异的首次理论描述。我们所识别出的两种印记模式之间的选择效率偏差对自然种群和家畜种群具有启示意义,我们将对此进行讨论。