Suppr超能文献

相互印记基因与对某一性别的选择反应。

Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.

作者信息

Patten Manus M, Haig David

机构信息

Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.

出版信息

Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1389-94. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077651. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

Abstract

We explore the theoretical consequences of limiting selection to males for the evolution of imprinted genes. We find that the efficiency of male-limited selection depends on the pattern of imprinting at an imprinted locus. When selection is strong, the maternally expressed pattern of imprinting allows faster genetic change than the reciprocal, paternally expressed pattern. When selection is relatively weak, the pattern of imprinting that permits a greater rate of genetic response to selection depends on the frequency of the favored allele: the paternally expressed pattern permits faster genetic change than does the maternally expressed pattern at low frequencies of a favored allele; at higher frequencies of a favored allele, however, the maternally expressed pattern is again more conducive to a genetic response. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical description of a difference between the two reciprocal patterns of imprinting. The selective efficiency bias we identify between the two patterns of imprinting has implications for natural and livestock populations, which we discuss.

摘要

我们探讨了将选择限制在雄性个体上对印记基因进化的理论影响。我们发现,雄性受限选择的效率取决于印记位点的印记模式。当选择强烈时,母源表达的印记模式比相反的父源表达模式能带来更快的基因变化。当选择相对较弱时,允许对选择产生更大遗传响应速率的印记模式取决于有利等位基因的频率:在有利等位基因频率较低时,父源表达模式比母源表达模式能带来更快的基因变化;然而,在有利等位基因频率较高时,母源表达模式再次更有利于产生遗传响应。据我们所知,这是对两种相反印记模式差异的首次理论描述。我们所识别出的两种印记模式之间的选择效率偏差对自然种群和家畜种群具有启示意义,我们将对此进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Reciprocally imprinted genes and the response to selection on one sex.
Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1389-94. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077651. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
2
The conflict theory of genomic imprinting: how much can be explained?
Curr Top Dev Biol. 1998;40:255-93. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60369-5.
3
Paternally Expressed Imprinted Genes under Positive Darwinian Selection in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Jun 1;36(6):1239-1253. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz063.
5
A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting.
PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(12):e380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040380.
6
Population-genetic models of sex-limited genomic imprinting.
Theor Popul Biol. 2017 Jun;115:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
7
The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models.
Theor Popul Biol. 1997 Feb;51(1):23-35. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1293.
8
Genomic imprinting of the X chromosome: a novel mechanism for the evolution of sexual dimorphism.
J Lab Clin Med. 1999 Jan;133(1):23-32. doi: 10.1053/lc.1999.v133.a94575.
9
Gene interactions in the evolution of genomic imprinting.
Heredity (Edinb). 2014 Aug;113(2):129-37. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.7. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
10
A novel method for using RNA-seq data to identify imprinted genes in social Hymenoptera with multiply mated queens.
J Evol Biol. 2020 Dec;33(12):1770-1782. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13716. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 26;116(48):24157-24163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906568116. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting.
Genetics. 2019 Jan;211(1):75-88. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301373. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Sex Differences in Neurotoxicogenetics.
Front Genet. 2018 Jun 5;9:196. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00196. eCollection 2018.
5
The scope and strength of sex-specific selection in genome evolution.
J Evol Biol. 2013 Sep;26(9):1841-53. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12201. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
6
Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.
Ecol Evol. 2013 Jun;3(6):1819-34. doi: 10.1002/ece3.540. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Human sexual conflict from molecules to culture.
Evol Psychol. 2011 Dec 15;9(4):564-87. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900408.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysing gametic variation with an animal model.
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Feb;85(6-7):868-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00225031.
2
Gametic imprinting effects on rate and composition of pig growth.
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Sep;88(8):1037-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00220813.
3
Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.
Genetics. 2007 Jun;176(2):1101-18. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.071555. Epub 2007 Apr 15.
4
A statistical framework for genome-wide scanning and testing of imprinted quantitative trait loci.
J Theor Biol. 2007 Jan 7;244(1):115-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
5
A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.
Genetics. 2006 Oct;174(2):931-5. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.060475. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
6
Model for mapping imprinted quantitative trait loci in an inbred F2 design.
Genomics. 2006 Apr;87(4):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.11.021. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
7
A census of mammalian imprinting.
Trends Genet. 2005 Aug;21(8):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.008.
8
Mapping and exclusion mapping of genomic imprinting effects in mouse F2 families.
J Hered. 2005 Jul-Aug;96(4):329-38. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi044. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
9
Basics of gametic imprinting.
J Anim Sci. 1999;77 Suppl 2:228-37. doi: 10.2527/1999.77suppl_2228x.
10
Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.
Genetics. 2004 Aug;167(4):1537-46. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.026211.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验