• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意义务与政治期望。第4部分:作为政治承诺的标准。

Duty of care and political expectations. Part 4: standards as a political promise.

作者信息

Fullbrook Suzanne

机构信息

Nursing Law and Politics, Faculty of Health, London South Bank University.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2008;17(9):596-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.9.29247.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2008.17.9.29247
PMID:18562995
Abstract

The last article was concerned to identify connections that exist between principles elucidated at common law that affect the behaviour of nurses - and the exposition of principles contained in the literature produced by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). This was in order to identify a level of expectation directed at nurse's practice in terms of health care provided. Although there was not a great difference, and clarity was seen in both areas, the issue of political expectation was introduced.

摘要

上一篇文章关注的是确定普通法中阐明的、影响护士行为的原则与护理和助产士理事会(NMC)所发表文献中原则阐述之间存在的联系。这样做是为了确定在提供医疗保健方面针对护士执业的期望水平。尽管两者差异不大,且两个领域都较为清晰,但引入了政治期望的问题。

相似文献

1
Duty of care and political expectations. Part 4: standards as a political promise.注意义务与政治期望。第4部分:作为政治承诺的标准。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(9):596-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.9.29247.
2
Duty of care and political expectations. Part 3: law and the new code.注意义务与政治期望。第3部分:法律与新准则。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(8):538-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.8.29209.
3
The duty of care and political expectations. Part 1: a literature review.注意义务与政治期望。第一部分:文献综述。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(6):386-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.6.28905.
4
Duty of care and political expectations. Part 5: standards and clinical outcomes.注意义务与政治期望。第5部分:标准与临床结果。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(10):650-2. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29480.
5
Understanding the Code: use of medicines.解读准则:药物的使用
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Dec;20(12):616-8. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.12.616.
6
Evidence-based practice: a mixture of motives?循证实践:动机的混合?
Nurs Times. 1998;94(23):61-4.
7
Understanding the Code: upholding dignity.理解准则:维护尊严。
Br J Community Nurs. 2015 Apr;20(4):196-8. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.4.196.
8
Ethical and professional concerns in research utilisation: intentional rounding in the United Kingdom.
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Nov;20(7):784-97. doi: 10.1177/0969733013478306. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
9
Nursing, politics and policy: a response to Clifford.护理、政治与政策:对克利福德的回应
Nurse Educ Today. 2000 Oct;20(7):519-23. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0505.
10
[Quality assurance in nursing--too much of a good thing!].[护理中的质量保证——好事过头了!]
Pflege Z. 2010 Aug;63(8):449.