• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证实践:动机的混合?

Evidence-based practice: a mixture of motives?

作者信息

Salvage J

出版信息

Nurs Times. 1998;94(23):61-4.

PMID:9687761
Abstract

The growing importance of research and development in the NHS presents a major challenge to nurses. They are not centrally involved in influencing the R&D agenda, while nursing research, despite its recent boom, is not seen as integral to evidence-based practice. This paper suggests that the R&D initiative, like most policy developments, mixes altruism and pragmatism. Its aims include cost containment and control of the professions, alongside its more overtly expressed commitment to improving the quality of care. Useful efforts are being made to tackle the shortcomings of nursing research. However, the paper argues that nurses attempting to influence the R&D agenda need to be alert to its political nuances if they are to be effective.

摘要

国民保健制度(NHS)中研发的重要性日益凸显,这给护士带来了重大挑战。他们并未在核心层面参与影响研发议程,而护理研究尽管近期蓬勃发展,但并未被视为循证实践的不可或缺部分。本文认为,与大多数政策发展一样,研发倡议兼具利他主义和实用主义。其目标包括成本控制和行业管控,以及更明确表达的改善护理质量的承诺。为解决护理研究的不足正在做出有益努力。然而,本文认为,试图影响研发议程的护士若要取得成效,就需要警惕其政治细微差别。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based practice: a mixture of motives?循证实践:动机的混合?
Nurs Times. 1998;94(23):61-4.
2
Nursing in the public sphere: breaching the boundary between research and policy.公共领域中的护理:突破研究与政策之间的界限。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):817-24.
3
Duty of care and political expectations. Part 4: standards as a political promise.注意义务与政治期望。第4部分:作为政治承诺的标准。
Br J Nurs. 2008;17(9):596-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.9.29247.
4
Is nursing research the key to raising standards of care?护理研究是提高护理标准的关键吗?
Nurs Times. 2001;97(46):16.
5
Do the right thing.
Nurs Times. 1998;94(27):28-9.
6
Nursing in the public sphere: health policy research in a changing world.公共领域中的护理:变化世界中的卫生政策研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Feb;33(3):387-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01675.x.
7
Will current clinical effectiveness initiatives encourage and facilitate practitioners to use evidence-based practice for the benefit of their clients?
J Clin Nurs. 1998 May;7(3):244-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00178.x.
8
Clinical governance in the real world.现实世界中的临床治理。
Nurs Times. 2001;97(50):36-7.
9
The meaning of evidence-based nursing.
Nurs Ethics. 2006 Sep;13(5):453-4. doi: 10.1191/0969733006nej902ed.
10
Ethical and professional concerns in research utilisation: intentional rounding in the United Kingdom.
Nurs Ethics. 2013 Nov;20(7):784-97. doi: 10.1177/0969733013478306. Epub 2013 Mar 26.