Lang N P, Nyman S, Senn C, Joss A
University of Berne, School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Apr;18(4):257-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00424.x.
The present study was designed to determine the threshold pressure value to be applied in provoking bleeding on probing (BOP) in clinically healthy gingival units. 12 female dental hygiene students volunteered for the study. They were selected on the basis of excellent oral hygiene standards, absence of probing depths greater than 3 mm and absence of caries or dental restorations on smooth and proximal tooth surfaces. Applying a probing force of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 N in one of the 4 jaw quadrants, respectively, on 2 different occasions with an interval of 10 days, bleeding on probing was assessed. Oral hygiene and gingival conditions were determined using the criteria of the plaque control record and the gingival index. On the basis of the BOP values, obtained using the lowest probing force (0.25 N), the subjects were divided into 2 groups: group 1 ("minimal BOP" value) consisted of 6 subjects yielding practically no bleeding (mean BOP = 0.9%) at both examinations, while the subjects of group 2 ("low BOP" value) had slightly higher BOP% (mean BOP = 13.4%). Both groups showed significant increase in mean BOP% with increasing probing force (0.9%-36.1% in group 1 and 13.4%-47.0% in group 2). Regression analysis revealed an almost linear correlation and a high correlation coefficient between BOP% and probing force. The comparison of the regression lines of the 2 groups showed almost identical slope inclination. However, slight differences in slope inclination were found for different sites: approximal sites clearly yielded steeper regression lines than buccal/oral sites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在确定在临床健康牙龈单位中诱发探诊出血(BOP)时应施加的阈值压力值。12名女性口腔卫生专业学生自愿参与本研究。他们是根据良好的口腔卫生标准、探诊深度不超过3mm、光滑牙面和邻面无龋或牙修复体而挑选出来的。在4个牙颌象限中的1个象限,分别以0.25、0.5、0.75和1.0N的探诊力,在2个不同时间、间隔10天进行操作,评估探诊出血情况。使用菌斑控制记录标准和牙龈指数来确定口腔卫生和牙龈状况。根据使用最低探诊力(0.25N)获得的BOP值,将受试者分为2组:第1组(“最小BOP”值)由6名受试者组成,两次检查时几乎均未出血(平均BOP = 0.9%),而第2组(“低BOP”值)的受试者BOP%略高(平均BOP = 13.4%)。两组的平均BOP%均随探诊力增加而显著增加(第1组为0.9%-36.1%,第2组为13.4%-47.0%)。回归分析显示BOP%与探诊力之间几乎呈线性相关且相关系数较高。两组回归线的比较显示斜率几乎相同。然而,不同部位的斜率存在细微差异:邻面部位的回归线明显比颊/面部位更陡。(摘要截断于250字)