Suppr超能文献

作为牙龈炎症临床参数的“探诊出血”与“牙龈指数出血”的关系。

Relationship of "bleeding on probing" and "gingival index bleeding" as clinical parameters of gingival inflammation.

作者信息

Chaves E S, Wood R C, Jones A A, Newbold D A, Manwell M A, Kornman K S

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Feb;20(2):139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1993.tb00328.x.

Abstract

Bleeding on probing (BOP) and the gingival index have been used to clinically characterize the degree of gingival inflammation. It is, however, unclear to what extent these parameters correlate to each other and to probing pocket depth (PD). The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the association between BOP and GI bleeding (scores of 2 and 3), as well as the relationship of these variables to PD, in a group of patients presenting with naturally-occurring gingivitis. Based on screening examinations of 125 subjects with at least 20 teeth, no more than 4 sites with PD over 6 mm, a BOP frequency of 30% or greater, and no systemic condition that would influence the inflammatory response, were selected. 2 weeks after screening they were examined at 6 sites per tooth for plaque index, GI, PD and BOP. A standardized pressure sensitive probe (Florida Probe) with 20 g probing force was used for BOP and PD measurements. In this population, means of 40.9% (S.E. = 1.36) BOP sites and 35.3% (S.E. = 1.81) GI bleeding sites per patient were found. A total of 20,008 sites ranging in PD up to 5.9 mm were evaluated; however, the majority of sites (19,723, 98.6%) presented with < 4 mm PD. When sites were evaluated, BOP demonstrated a positive correlation with PD, whereas GI bleeding correlated with PD. For sites characterized by the absence of BOP as well as the absence of GI bleeding (scores 0 and 1), the highest % of agreement between the 2 indices (77.7%) was found in shallow sites (0.1-2 mm).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

探诊出血(BOP)和牙龈指数已被用于临床上表征牙龈炎症的程度。然而,这些参数之间以及与探诊深度(PD)的关联程度尚不清楚。本临床研究的目的是评估一组自然发生牙龈炎患者中BOP与牙龈出血指数(评分为2和3)之间的关联,以及这些变量与PD的关系。基于对125名至少有20颗牙齿、牙周袋深度超过6mm的部位不超过4个、BOP发生率为30%或更高且无影响炎症反应的全身状况的受试者进行筛查检查,从中选取研究对象。筛查2周后,对他们每颗牙齿的6个部位进行菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙周袋深度和探诊出血检查。使用具有20g探诊力的标准化压敏探针(佛罗里达探针)进行探诊出血和牙周袋深度测量。在该人群中,发现每位患者探诊出血部位的平均值为40.9%(标准误=1.36),牙龈出血指数部位的平均值为35.3%(标准误=1.81)。共评估了20008个牙周袋深度达5.9mm的部位;然而,大多数部位(19723个,98.6%)的牙周袋深度<4mm。在评估部位时,探诊出血与牙周袋深度呈正相关,而牙龈出血与牙周袋深度相关。对于探诊出血和牙龈出血均不存在(评分为0和1)的部位,在浅部位(0.1 - 2mm)发现两个指数之间的最高一致性百分比(77.7%)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验