• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单前臂骨折的钢板内固定:锁定加压钢板与动力加压钢板的比较

Plate osteosynthesis of simple forearm fractures: LCP versus DC plates.

作者信息

Stevens Charles Tjerk, ten Duis Henk Jan

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Apr;74(2):180-3.

PMID:18564472
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the time to radiological bony union of simple A-type fractures of the forearm, treated with either a locking compression plate (LCP) or a dynamic compression plate (DCP). For each fracture, the relation between the use of compression and radiological healing time was studied. Nine fractures were treated with LCP and 10 fractures with DC plates. The mean time to definite radiological bony union in the LCP group was 33 weeks and in the DCP group 22 weeks. Compression was used in 7 fractures in the DCP group and in 3 fractures in the LCP group. The compressed fractures, irrespective of the type of plate, healed 10 weeks faster than the non-compressed fractures. Time to definite radiological bony union of simple A-type fractures does not depend on the type of plate used, but on the application of axial or interfragmentary compression.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较采用锁定加压钢板(LCP)或动力加压钢板(DCP)治疗的单纯A型前臂骨折达到影像学骨愈合的时间。针对每例骨折,研究了加压使用情况与影像学愈合时间之间的关系。9例骨折采用LCP治疗,10例骨折采用DCP治疗。LCP组达到明确影像学骨愈合的平均时间为33周,DCP组为22周。DCP组7例骨折使用了加压,LCP组3例骨折使用了加压。无论使用何种类型的钢板,加压的骨折比未加压的骨折愈合快10周。单纯A型骨折达到明确影像学骨愈合的时间不取决于所使用钢板的类型,而是取决于轴向或骨折块间加压的应用。

相似文献

1
Plate osteosynthesis of simple forearm fractures: LCP versus DC plates.简单前臂骨折的钢板内固定:锁定加压钢板与动力加压钢板的比较
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Apr;74(2):180-3.
2
[Case-control study on minimally invasive percutaneous locking compression plate internal fixation for the treatment of type II and III pilon fractures].微创经皮锁定加压钢板内固定治疗Ⅱ、Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的病例对照研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Dec;24(12):1010-2.
3
Effectiveness of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures.锁定钢板与动力加压钢板治疗前臂骨干骨折的疗效比较
Orthopedics. 2013 Jul;36(7):e917-22. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-23.
4
Treatment of type 2 and 4 olecranon fractures with locking compression plate osteosynthesis in horses: a prospective study (2002-2008).锁定加压钢板接骨术治疗马的2型和4型鹰嘴骨折:一项前瞻性研究(2002 - 2008年)
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2011;24(1):57-61. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-10-02-0020. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
5
Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients.锁定加压钢板结合微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨干和远端骨折:32例患者的回顾性研究
Injury. 2007 Mar;38(3):365-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.10.024. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
6
Appendicular fracture repair in dogs using the locking compression plate system: 47 cases.使用锁定加压接骨板系统治疗犬的四肢骨折:47例病例
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(4):309-15. doi: 10.3415/VCOT08-05-0044. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
7
A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.在骨质疏松骨模型中锁定加压钢板(LCP)与低接触动力加压钢板(DCP)的力学比较。
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Feb;22(2):121-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318160c84c.
8
A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.在犬类尸体肱骨远端干骺端间隙模型中,对3.5锁定加压钢板固定与3.5有限接触动力加压钢板固定进行生物力学比较。
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(4):270-7. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-08-05-0042. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
9
[Osteosynthesis with metal compression plates in fresh and ununited fractures, pseudarthroses and bone defects of the forearm].[使用金属加压钢板治疗前臂新鲜骨折、未愈合骨折、假关节和骨缺损的骨接合术]
Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1981 May;126(5):113-7.
10
Mechanical comparison of 3.5 mm broad dynamic compression plate, broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and narrow locking compression plate systems using interfragmentary gap models.使用骨折块间间隙模型对3.5毫米宽动力加压钢板、宽有限接触动力加压钢板和窄锁定加压钢板系统进行力学比较。
Vet Surg. 2008 Oct;37(7):663-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00433.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis for LCP plates.锁定加压钢板的有限元分析
J Orthop. 2025 May 5;65:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.04.012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Alternative treatment of forearm double fractures: new design intramedullary nail.前臂双骨折的替代治疗:新型髓内钉
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Oct;134(10):1387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2058-9. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
3
Four-Screw Plate Fixation vs Conventional Fixation for Diaphyseal Fractures of the Forearm.前臂骨干骨折的四螺钉钢板固定与传统固定对比
Trauma Mon. 2012 Spring;17(1):245-9. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.4497. Epub 2012 May 26.
4
Treatment of isolated diaphyseal fractures of the radius with an intramedullary nail in adults.成人桡骨干孤立性骨折的髓内钉治疗
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1085-93. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1398-4. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
5
Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate (Letter 2).前臂双骨折的内固定:锁定加压钢板与有限接触动力加压钢板的比较(信函2)
Indian J Orthop. 2012 May;46(3):375-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.96375.
6
Internal fixation of fractures of both bones forearm: Comparison of locked compression and limited contact dynamic compression plate.前臂双骨折的内固定:锁定加压钢板与有限接触动力加压钢板的比较
Indian J Orthop. 2011 Sep;45(5):417-21. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.83762.