• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲癌症临床实践协调组织(CoCanCPG)。欧洲癌症临床实践的协调。

CoCanCPG. Coordination of cancer clinical practice in Europe.

作者信息

Fervers Bèatrice, Remy-Stockinger Magali, Mazeau-Woynar Valèrie, Otter Renèe, Liberati Alessandro, Littlejohns Peter, Qureshi Safia, Vlayen Joan, Characiejus Dainius, Corbacho Belèn, Garner Sarah, Hamza-Mohamed Farida, Hermosilla Teresa, Kersten Sonja, Kulig Michael, Leshem Benny, Levine Nava, Ballini Luciana, Middelton Clifford, Mlika-Cabane Najoua, Paquet Louise, Podmaniczki Erzsèbet, Ramaekers Dirk, Robinson Eliezer, Sanchez Emilia, Philip Thierry

机构信息

Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer SOR/Centre Léon Bérard, EA 4129 Santé-Individu-Société, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Tumori. 2008 Mar-Apr;94(2):154-9. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400204.

DOI:10.1177/030089160809400204
PMID:18564600
Abstract

All European countries are facing common challenges for delivering appropriate, evidence-based care to patients with cancer. Despite tangible improvements in diagnosis and treatment, marked differences in cancer survival exist throughout Europe. The reliable translation of new research evidence into consistent patient-oriented strategies is a key endeavour to overcome inequalities in healthcare. Clinical-practice guidelines are important tools for improving quality of care by informing professionals and patients about the most appropriate clinical practice. Guideline programmes in different countries use similar strategies to achieve similar goals. This results in unnecessary duplication of effort and inefficient use of resources. While different initiatives at the international level have attempted to improve the quality of guidelines, less investment has been made to overcome existing fragmentation and duplication of effort in cancer guideline development and research. To provide added value to existing initiatives and foster equitable access to evidence-based cancer care in Europe, CoCanCPG will establish cooperation between cancer guideline programmes. CoCanCPG is an ERA-Net coordinated by the French National Cancer Institute with 17 partners from 11 countries. The CoCanCPG partners will achieve their goal through an ambitious, stepwise approach with a long-term perspective, involving: 1. implementing a common framework for sharing knowledge and skills; 2. developing shared activities for guideline development; 3. assembling a critical mass for pertinent research into guideline methods; 4. implementing an appropriate framework for cooperation. Successful development of joint activities involves learning how to adopt common quality standards and how to share responsibilities, while taking into account the cultural and organisational diversity of the participating organisations. Languages barriers and different organisational settings add a level of complexity to setting up transnational collaboration. Through its activities, CoCanCPG will make an important contribution towards better access to evidence-based cancer practices and thus contribute to reducing inequalities and improving care for patients with cancer across Europe.

摘要

所有欧洲国家在为癌症患者提供恰当的、基于证据的治疗方面都面临着共同挑战。尽管在诊断和治疗方面有了切实改善,但整个欧洲的癌症生存率仍存在显著差异。将新的研究证据可靠地转化为一致的以患者为导向的策略,是克服医疗保健不平等现象的一项关键努力。临床实践指南是通过向专业人员和患者告知最合适的临床实践来提高医疗质量的重要工具。不同国家的指南项目采用类似策略以实现类似目标。这导致了不必要的工作重复和资源利用效率低下。虽然国际层面的不同举措试图提高指南质量,但在克服癌症指南制定和研究中现有的碎片化和工作重复方面投入较少。为了为现有举措增添价值并促进欧洲公平获得基于证据的癌症治疗,CoCanCPG将在癌症指南项目之间建立合作。CoCanCPG是一个由法国国家癌症研究所协调的欧洲研究区域网络,有来自11个国家的17个合作伙伴。CoCanCPG的合作伙伴将通过一种雄心勃勃、具有长期视角的逐步方法来实现其目标,包括:1. 实施一个共享知识和技能的共同框架;2. 开展指南制定的共享活动;3. 聚集大量人员对指南方法进行相关研究;4. 实施一个合适的合作框架。成功开展联合活动涉及学习如何采用共同的质量标准以及如何分担责任,同时考虑到参与组织的文化和组织多样性。语言障碍和不同的组织环境给建立跨国合作增加了一定的复杂性。通过其活动,CoCanCPG将为更好地获得基于证据的癌症治疗方法做出重要贡献,从而有助于减少不平等现象并改善全欧洲癌症患者的护理。

相似文献

1
CoCanCPG. Coordination of cancer clinical practice in Europe.欧洲癌症临床实践协调组织(CoCanCPG)。欧洲癌症临床实践的协调。
Tumori. 2008 Mar-Apr;94(2):154-9. doi: 10.1177/030089160809400204.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
4
Building Kidney Exchange Programmes in Europe-An Overview of Exchange Practice and Activities.在欧洲建立肾脏交换项目:交换实践与活动概述。
Transplantation. 2019 Jul;103(7):1514-1522. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002432.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N).提高医疗保健质量:通过创建国际指南网络(G-I-N)利用国际合作来为指南项目提供信息。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13(6):455-60. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.455.
9
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
10
The European initiative for quality management in lung cancer care.欧洲肺癌护理质量管理倡议。
Eur Respir J. 2014 May;43(5):1254-77. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00106913. Epub 2014 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the Oral Human Attenuated Rotavirus Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis-2006-2016.口服人用减毒轮状病毒疫苗的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析(2006 - 2016年)
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 12;5(11):ofy292. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy292. eCollection 2018 Nov.
2
Carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae and other respiratory bacterial pathogens in low and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中低收入国家肺炎链球菌及其他呼吸道细菌病原体的携带情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 1;9(8):e103293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103293. eCollection 2014.
3
The updating of clinical practice guidelines: insights from an international survey.
临床实践指南的更新:国际调查的见解。
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 13;6:107. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-107.
4
The impact of disasters on populations with health and health care disparities.灾害对健康和医疗保健存在差异的人群的影响。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Mar;4(1):30-8. doi: 10.1017/s1935789300002391.
5
Clinical practice guidelines for cancer care: what are they for?癌症护理临床实践指南:其用途是什么?
Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Dec;11(12):775-6. doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0444-5.