• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生使用电子知识资源对临床及学习成果的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析

Impact of Clinicians' Use of Electronic Knowledge Resources on Clinical and Learning Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Maggio Lauren A, Aakre Christopher A, Del Fiol Guilherme, Shellum Jane, Cook David A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 25;21(7):e13315. doi: 10.2196/13315.

DOI:10.2196/13315
PMID:31359865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6690166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians use electronic knowledge resources, such as Micromedex, UpToDate, and Wikipedia, to deliver evidence-based care and engage in point-of-care learning. Despite this use in clinical practice, their impact on patient care and learning outcomes is incompletely understood. A comprehensive synthesis of available evidence regarding the effectiveness of electronic knowledge resources would guide clinicians, health care system administrators, medical educators, and informaticians in making evidence-based decisions about their purchase, implementation, and use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to quantify the impact of electronic knowledge resources on clinical and learning outcomes.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from 1991 to 2017. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted outcomes related to knowledge, skills, attitudes, behaviors, patient effects, and cost. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs) across studies.

RESULTS

Of 10,811 studies screened, we identified 25 eligible studies published between 2003 and 2016. A total of 5 studies were randomized trials, 22 involved physicians in practice or training, and 10 reported potential conflicts of interest. A total of 15 studies compared electronic knowledge resources with no intervention. Of these, 7 reported clinician behaviors, with a pooled SMD of 0.47 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.67; P<.001), and 8 reported objective patient effects with a pooled SMD of 0.19 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.32; P=.003). Heterogeneity was large (I>50%) across studies. When compared with other resources-7 studies, not amenable to meta-analytic pooling-the use of electronic knowledge resources was associated with increased frequency of answering questions and perceived benefits on patient care, with variable impact on time to find an answer. A total of 2 studies compared different implementations of the same electronic knowledge resource.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of electronic knowledge resources is associated with a positive impact on clinician behaviors and patient effects. We found statistically significant associations between the use of electronic knowledge resources and improved clinician behaviors and patient effects. When compared with other resources, the use of electronic knowledge resources was associated with increased success in answering clinical questions, with variable impact on speed. Comparisons of different implementation strategies of the same electronic knowledge resource suggest that there are benefits from allowing clinicians to choose to access the resource, versus automated display of resource information, and from integrating patient-specific information. A total of 4 studies compared different commercial electronic knowledge resources, with variable results. Resource implementation strategies can significantly influence outcomes but few studies have examined such factors.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/d23a2c3f6388/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/c8fcac84e92d/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/c51465542b46/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/d23a2c3f6388/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/c8fcac84e92d/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/c51465542b46/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f54b/6690166/d23a2c3f6388/jmir_v21i7e13315_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

临床医生使用电子知识资源,如Micromedex、UpToDate和维基百科,以提供循证医疗服务并进行床边即时学习。尽管这些资源在临床实践中得到了应用,但其对患者护理和学习成果的影响尚未完全明确。全面综合有关电子知识资源有效性的现有证据,将指导临床医生、医疗系统管理人员、医学教育工作者和信息专家就其购买、实施和使用做出循证决策。

目的

本综述的目的是量化电子知识资源对临床和学习成果的影响。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆中1991年至2017年发表的文章。两位作者独立筛选纳入研究,并提取与知识、技能、态度、行为、患者影响和成本相关的结果。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析来汇总各研究的标准化均数差(SMD)。

结果

在筛选的10811项研究中,我们确定了2003年至2016年间发表的25项符合条件的研究。共有5项研究为随机试验,22项涉及执业或培训中的医生,10项报告了潜在的利益冲突。共有15项研究将电子知识资源与无干预措施进行了比较。其中,7项报告了临床医生的行为,汇总SMD为0.47(95%CI 0.27至0.67;P<.001),8项报告了客观的患者影响,汇总SMD为0.19(95%CI 0.07至0.32;P=.003)。各研究间的异质性较大(I>50%)。与其他资源相比(7项研究,不适合进行荟萃分析汇总),使用电子知识资源与回答问题的频率增加以及对患者护理的感知益处相关,对查找答案的时间影响各异。共有2项研究比较了同一电子知识资源的不同实施方式。

结论

使用电子知识资源对临床医生行为和患者影响具有积极作用。我们发现电子知识资源的使用与临床医生行为改善和患者影响之间存在统计学上的显著关联。与其他资源相比,使用电子知识资源在回答临床问题方面成功率更高,对速度的影响各异。对同一电子知识资源不同实施策略的比较表明,允许临床医生选择访问资源相对于自动显示资源信息以及整合患者特定信息具有益处。共有4项研究比较了不同的商业电子知识资源,结果各异。资源实施策略可显著影响结果,但很少有研究考察这些因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of Clinicians' Use of Electronic Knowledge Resources on Clinical and Learning Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临床医生使用电子知识资源对临床及学习成果的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 25;21(7):e13315. doi: 10.2196/13315.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Electronic Knowledge Resources and Point-of-Care Learning: A Scoping Review.电子知识资源与即时学习:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S60-S67. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002375.
4
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.行为修正干预对初级保健中无法用医学解释的症状:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460.
7
Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.计算机决策支持系统在诊断、筛查或监测检验申请方面的交流应用:系统的效果和成本效益的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(48):1-227. doi: 10.3310/hta14480.
8
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Interventions for improving medical students' interpersonal communication in medical consultations.改善医学生医患沟通技能的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 8;2(2):CD012418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012418.pub2.
10
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
A Single-Site Qualitative Study Exploring What Cancer Patients and Health Care Professionals Consider to be the Core Priorities in Relation to Psychosocial Cancer Care.一项单中心定性研究,探讨癌症患者和医护人员认为心理社会癌症护理的核心优先事项是什么。
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251356320. doi: 10.1177/10732748251356320. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Identifying Aspirin as a Contributing Factor to Persistent Gout: A Case Report.将阿司匹林确定为持续性痛风的一个促成因素:病例报告
Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85940. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85940. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Where do UK clinicians find information at the point of care? A pragmatic, exploratory study.

本文引用的文献

1
Decreasing Resource Utilization Using Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs).使用标准化临床评估与管理计划(SCAMPs)降低资源利用
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Apr;39(4):169-174. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000873.
2
Electronic Knowledge Resources and Point-of-Care Learning: A Scoping Review.电子知识资源与即时学习:范围综述。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S60-S67. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002375.
3
More than 2 billion pairs of eyeballs: Why aren't you sharing medical knowledge on Wikipedia?
英国临床医生在护理点何处寻找信息?一项务实的探索性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 23;25(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02627-7.
4
Current Endodontic Practices among Romanian Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study.罗马尼亚牙科从业者当前的牙髓治疗实践:一项横断面研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;12(9):283. doi: 10.3390/dj12090283.
5
Straight to the point: evaluation of a Point of Care Information (POCI) resource in answering disease-related questions.直切主题:评估即时医疗信息资源(POCI)在回答疾病相关问题方面的效果。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Jan 16;112(1):13-21. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1770.
6
Information-seeking behaviour of primary care clinicians in Singapore at the point-of-care: A qualitative study.新加坡基层医疗临床医生在诊疗现场的信息寻求行为:一项定性研究。
Health Info Libr J. 2024 Dec;41(4):418-428. doi: 10.1111/hir.12535. Epub 2024 May 28.
7
Identifying primary care clinicians' preferences for, barriers to, and facilitators of information-seeking in clinical practice in Singapore: a qualitative study.识别新加坡初级保健临床医生在临床实践中信息检索的偏好、障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 18;25(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02429-x.
8
The use and perceived value of electronic health information resources by health care professionals in the field of medicine, pharmacy, and nursing in Jazan province, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉赞省医学、药学和护理领域医疗保健专业人员对电子健康信息资源的使用及感知价值
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 May;32(5):102056. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102056. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
9
Cognitive perspectives on maintaining physicians' medical expertise: I. Reimagining Maintenance of Certification to promote lifelong learning.认知视角下的医师医学专长维持:一、重新构想以促进终身学习为目的的继续医学教育认证。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 24;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00496-9.
10
A Study on User-Oriented Subjects of Child Abuse on Wikipedia: Temporal Analysis of Wikipedia History Versions and Traffic Data.基于用户导向的维基百科儿童虐待主题研究:维基百科历史版本和流量数据的时间分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e43901. doi: 10.2196/43901.
超过20亿双眼睛:你为什么不在维基百科上分享医学知识呢?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):90-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111040. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
4
Health sciences libraries' subscriptions to journals: expectations of general practice departments and collection-based analysis.健康科学图书馆的期刊订阅:全科医疗部门的期望与基于馆藏的分析
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):235-243. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.282. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
5
Clinical decision support alert malfunctions: analysis and empirically derived taxonomy.临床决策支持警报故障:分析及经验所得分类法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):496-506. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx106.
6
Professional Development Perceptions and Practices Among U.S. Physicians: A Cross-Specialty National Survey.美国医生的专业发展认知与实践:一项跨专业全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1335-1345. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001624.
7
Context-sensitive decision support (infobuttons) in electronic health records: a systematic review.电子健康记录中的上下文敏感决策支持(信息按钮):一项系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):460-468. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw104.
8
Analysis of clinical decision support system malfunctions: a case series and survey.临床决策支持系统故障分析:病例系列研究与调查
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1068-1076. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw005. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
9
Evaluating the appropriateness of electronic information resources for learning.评估用于学习的电子信息资源的适用性。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jan;104(1):24-32. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.1.004.
10
Implementation hurdles of an interactive, integrated, point-of-care computerised decision support system for hospital antibiotic prescription.用于医院抗生素处方的交互式、集成式、床边计算机化决策支持系统的实施障碍。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Feb;47(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 29.