Suppr超能文献

一项关于氯法拉滨对比氯法拉滨加小剂量阿糖胞苷作为60岁及以上急性髓系白血病和高危骨髓增生异常综合征患者一线治疗的随机研究。

A randomized study of clofarabine versus clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine as front-line therapy for patients aged 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

作者信息

Faderl Stefan, Ravandi Farhad, Huang Xuelin, Garcia-Manero Guillermo, Ferrajoli Alessandra, Estrov Zeev, Borthakur Gautam, Verstovsek Srdan, Thomas Deborah A, Kwari Monica, Kantarjian Hagop M

机构信息

Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Blood. 2008 Sep 1;112(5):1638-45. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-124602. Epub 2008 Jun 18.

Abstract

We previously reported the feasibility of clofarabine and cytarabine combinations in AML. Questions remain as to (1) the therapeutic advantage of this combination and (2) the role of lower doses of clofarabine and cytarabine in older patients. We have conducted an adaptively randomized study of lower-dose clofarabine with or without low-dose cytarabine in previously untreated patients with AML aged 60 years and older. Patients received 30 mg/m(2) clofarabine intravenously daily for 5 days with or without 20 mg/m(2) cytarabine subcutaneously daily for 14 days as induction. Consolidation consisted of 3 days of clofarabine with or without 7 days of cytarabine. Seventy patients were enrolled. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-83 years). Sixteen patients received clofarabine and 54 the combination. Overall, 56% achieved complete remission (CR). CR rate was significantly higher with the combination (63% vs 31%; P = .025). Induction mortality was 19% with the combination versus 31% with clofarabine alone (P = .276). The combination showed better event-free survival (7.1 months vs 1.7 months; P = .04), but not overall survival (11.4 months vs 5.8 months; P = .1). Clofarabine plus low-dose cytarabine has a higher response rate than clofarabine alone with comparable toxicity. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00088218.

摘要

我们之前报道了氯法拉滨与阿糖胞苷联合用药治疗急性髓系白血病(AML)的可行性。但仍存在以下问题:(1)这种联合用药的治疗优势;(2)较低剂量的氯法拉滨和阿糖胞苷在老年患者中的作用。我们开展了一项适应性随机研究,纳入60岁及以上初治AML患者,比较低剂量氯法拉滨联合或不联合低剂量阿糖胞苷的疗效。诱导治疗时,患者接受静脉注射氯法拉滨30mg/m²,每日1次,共5天,联合或不联合皮下注射阿糖胞苷20mg/m²,每日1次,共14天。巩固治疗为3天氯法拉滨,联合或不联合7天阿糖胞苷。共纳入70例患者,中位年龄71岁(范围60 - 83岁)。16例患者接受氯法拉滨单药治疗,54例接受联合治疗。总体而言,56%的患者达到完全缓解(CR)。联合治疗组的CR率显著更高(63%对31%;P = 0.025)。联合治疗组诱导死亡率为19%,氯法拉滨单药组为31%(P = 0.276)。联合治疗组无事件生存期更佳(7.1个月对1.7个月;P = 0.04),但总生存期无差异(11.4个月对5.8个月;P = 0.1)。氯法拉滨联合低剂量阿糖胞苷比氯法拉滨单药治疗缓解率更高,且毒性相当。本试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT00088218。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Anticancer Drug-Induced Capillary Leak Syndrome.抗癌药物诱导的毛细血管渗漏综合征
Kidney Int Rep. 2022 Feb 25;7(5):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.02.014. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Pragmatic, adaptive clinical trials: Is 2020 the dawning of a new age?务实的适应性临床试验:2020年是新时代的曙光吗?
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 17;19:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100614. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

7
Bayesian clinical trials.贝叶斯临床试验
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Jan;5(1):27-36. doi: 10.1038/nrd1927.
8
Age and acute myeloid leukemia.年龄与急性髓系白血病
Blood. 2006 May 1;107(9):3481-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3724. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
10
Clofarabine.氯法拉滨
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 May;Suppl:S12-3. doi: 10.1038/nrd1724.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验