• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

受到关注的因素:障碍与促进因素认知如何与创新型心理健康实践的采用和实施相关联。

What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices.

作者信息

Seffrin Bev, Panzano Phyllis C, Roth Dee

机构信息

Decision Support Services, Inc, Columbus, OH 43215, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2008 Dec;44(6):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9151-x. Epub 2008 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-008-9151-x
PMID:18566889
Abstract

This mixed-method study examined the facilitators and barriers discussed by 166 informants interviewed from 78 innovative mental health projects. Facilitator and barrier coding reflected two dimensions: the topic of the comment (e.g., funding); and the time phase of the issue's influence (e.g., pre-decision). Proportions of facilitators to the sum of facilitator and barrier comments made by project informants were calculated. Overall, facilitator proportions were higher for projects that proceeded with implementation than those that did not adopt the practice. In addition, facilitator proportions were generally highest at pre-decision and lowest at full implementation for implementing projects.

摘要

这项混合方法研究调查了从78个创新心理健康项目中采访的166名受访者所讨论的促进因素和障碍。促进因素和障碍编码反映了两个维度:评论的主题(如资金);以及问题影响的时间阶段(如决策前)。计算了项目受访者提出的促进因素占促进因素和障碍评论总和的比例。总体而言,继续实施的项目的促进因素比例高于未采用该做法的项目。此外,对于实施中的项目,促进因素比例通常在决策前最高,在全面实施时最低。

相似文献

1
What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices.受到关注的因素:障碍与促进因素认知如何与创新型心理健康实践的采用和实施相关联。
Community Ment Health J. 2008 Dec;44(6):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9151-x. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
2
What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices.引人关注之处:障碍与促进因素认知如何与创新型心理健康实践的采用和实施相关联。
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9222-7. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
3
Deciding versus implementing: a comment on "What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices".
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):270-1. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9190-y. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
4
Adoption of innovative and evidence-based practices for children and adolescents in state-supported mental health clinics: a qualitative study.州立支持的心理健康诊所中针对儿童和青少年采用创新及循证实践:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Mar 29;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0190-z.
5
Erratum to: What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices.
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Apr;51(3):321. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9832-1.
6
Implementing a pharmacy system: facilitators and barriers.实施药房系统:促进因素与障碍
J Med Syst. 2009 Apr;33(2):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9167-3.
7
Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study.卫生系统中实施循证决策支持的障碍、促进因素及对后续步骤的看法:一项定性研究
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 5;9:179. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8.
8
The decision to adopt evidence-based and other innovative mental health practices: risky business?采用循证及其他创新型心理健康实践的决策:冒险之举?
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1153-61. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1153.
9
Addiction treatment staff perceptions of training as a facilitator or barrier to implementing evidence-based practices: a national qualitative research study.成瘾治疗工作人员对培训作为实施循证实践的促进因素或障碍的看法:一项全国性定性研究。
Subst Abus. 2015;36(1):42-50. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.849646. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
The de-adoption of innovative mental health practices (IMHP): why organizations choose not to sustain an IMHP.创新心理健康实践的摒弃:组织为何选择不再维持创新心理健康实践
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):50-65. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0141-z. Epub 2007 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring County-Level Resources Influencing Evidence-Based Practices and Treatment Uptake in Behavioral Health Settings.探索影响行为健康环境中循证实践和治疗采用率的县级资源。
Corrections. 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1080/23774657.2024.2447693.
2
New directions for psychiatric rehabilitation in the USA.美国精神病康复的新方向。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Jun;26(3):223-227. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000834. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
3
Integrating care for frequent users of emergency departments: implementation evaluation of a brief multi-organizational intensive case management intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Project IMPACT: a report on barriers and facilitators to sustainability.“影响项目”:关于可持续发展的障碍与促进因素的报告。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):718-29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0086-7.
2
The decision to adopt evidence-based and other innovative mental health practices: risky business?采用循证及其他创新型心理健康实践的决策:冒险之举?
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1153-61. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1153.
3
The organizational context of children's mental health services.儿童心理健康服务的组织背景。
整合急诊科频繁使用者的护理:一项简短的多组织强化病例管理干预措施的实施评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 27;16:156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1407-5.
4
Measuring Organizational Capacity to Treat Co-Occurring Psychiatric and Substance Use Disorders.衡量治疗同时存在的精神疾病和物质使用障碍的组织能力。
J Dual Diagn. 2013 Jan 1;9(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2013.779051.
5
Community Providers' Impression of HIV Prevention Intervention Research in NIDA's Clinical Trials Network.社区服务提供者对美国国家药物滥用研究所临床试验网络中艾滋病预防干预研究的印象。
J Drug Issues. 2011;41(4):441-446. doi: 10.1177/002204261104100401.
6
The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research.新计划和创新的可持续性:对实证文献的回顾和对未来研究的建议。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17.
7
Building organizational knowledge and value: informed decision making in Kansas children's community-based mental health services.构建组织知识和价值:堪萨斯州儿童社区心理健康服务中的明智决策。
Community Ment Health J. 2012 Feb;48(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9334-0. Epub 2010 Jul 10.
8
Implementing evidence-based practices for people with schizophrenia.为精神分裂症患者实施循证实践。
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jul;35(4):704-13. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp041. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
9
Deciding versus implementing: a comment on "What gets noticed: how barrier and facilitator perceptions relate to the adoption and implementation of innovative mental health practices".
Community Ment Health J. 2009 Aug;45(4):270-1. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9190-y. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10
A naturalistic study of MST dissemination in 13 Ohio communities.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul;36(3):344-60. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9124-4. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002 Dec;5(4):233-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1020972906177.
4
Identifying meaningful subgroups of adults with severe mental illness.
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Apr;53(4):452-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.4.452.
5
Organizational process: a missing link between research and practice.组织过程:研究与实践之间缺失的环节。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Dec;52(12):1607-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1607.
6
Strategies for disseminating evidence-based practices to staff who treat people with serious mental illness.向治疗严重精神疾病患者的工作人员传播循证实践的策略。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Dec;52(12):1598-606. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1598.
7
Policy implications for implementing evidence-based practices.实施循证实践的政策影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Dec;52(12):1591-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1591.
8
Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis.实施计算机化技术:组织分析
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):811-24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811.
9
Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness.为患有严重精神疾病的客户提供双重诊断服务。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Apr;52(4):469-76. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.469.
10
The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: development and implementation of the schizophrenia algorithm.德克萨斯药物治疗算法项目:精神分裂症算法的开发与实施
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jan;50(1):69-74. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.1.69.