• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“影响项目”:关于可持续发展的障碍与促进因素的报告。

Project IMPACT: a report on barriers and facilitators to sustainability.

作者信息

Blasinsky Margaret, Goldman Howard H, Unützer Jürgen

机构信息

CSR Incorporated, Arlington, VA 22201, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):718-29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0086-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-006-0086-7
PMID:16967339
Abstract

Project IMPACT is a collaborative care intervention to assist older adults suffering from major depressive disorder or dysthymia. Qualitative research methods were used to determine the barriers and facilitators to sustaining IMPACT in a primary care setting. Strong evidence supports the program's sustainability, but considerable variation exists in continuation strategies and operationalization across sites. Sustainability depended on the organizations' support of collaborative care models, the availability of staff trained in the intervention, and funding. The intervention's success was the most important sustainability factor, as documented by outcome data and through the "real world" experience of treating patients with this intervention.

摘要

“影响项目”是一项协作式护理干预措施,旨在帮助患有重度抑郁症或心境恶劣障碍的老年人。采用定性研究方法来确定在初级保健环境中维持“影响项目”的障碍和促进因素。有力证据支持该项目的可持续性,但各地点在延续策略和实施方面存在相当大的差异。可持续性取决于各组织对协作式护理模式的支持、接受该干预措施培训的工作人员的可用性以及资金。干预措施的成功是最重要的可持续性因素,结果数据以及通过使用该干预措施治疗患者的“现实世界”经验都证明了这一点。

相似文献

1
Project IMPACT: a report on barriers and facilitators to sustainability.“影响项目”:关于可持续发展的障碍与促进因素的报告。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 Nov;33(6):718-29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0086-7.
2
Funding mechanisms for depression care management: opportunities and challenges.抑郁症护理管理的资金机制:机遇与挑战。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;28(4):278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.03.006.
3
A collaborative approach to embedding graduate primary care mental health workers in the UK National Health Service.一种将初级保健精神卫生研究生工作人员纳入英国国民医疗服务体系的协作方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2008 Sep;16(5):451-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00754.x. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
4
Pain limits the effectiveness of collaborative care for depression.疼痛会限制抑郁症协作护理的效果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;15(8):699-707. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180325a2d.
5
Clinician- and organization-level factors in the adoption of evidence-based care for depression in primary care.基层医疗中采用基于证据的抑郁症护理的临床医生和组织层面因素。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Oct-Dec;33(4):289-99. doi: 10.1097/01.HCM.0000318766.29277.49.
6
A consumer perspective of diagnosis and treatment of chronic major depression.消费者对慢性重度抑郁症诊断与治疗的看法。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62 Suppl 6:30-4.
7
A fidelity measure for integrated management of depression in primary care.基层医疗中抑郁症综合管理的一种保真度测量方法。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1030-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233683.82254.63.
8
A randomized trial of a brief mental health intervention for primary care patients.一项针对初级保健患者的简短心理健康干预随机试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;74(6):1173-9. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1173.
9
Using the chronic care model to tackle depression among older adults who have long-term physical conditions.运用慢性病护理模式应对患有长期身体疾病的老年人的抑郁症问题。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 May;14(3):233-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01066.x.
10
From establishing an evidence-based practice to implementation in real-world settings: IMPACT as a case study.从建立循证实践到在实际环境中实施:以IMPACT为例进行研究
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;28(4):1079-92. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2005.09.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal exploration of the delivery of care following a successful antenatal practice change intervention.对成功的产前实践变革干预措施实施后的护理提供情况进行纵向探索。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 9;12:1476083. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1476083. eCollection 2025.
2
Mental health integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a scoping review.初级保健中的心理健康综合护理模式及其有效实施的影响因素:一项范围综述
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 9;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00625-x.
3
Facilitators and barriers of routine psychosocial distress assessment within a stepped and collaborative care model in a Swiss hospital setting.
瑞士医院环境中,阶梯式协作护理模式下常规心理困扰评估的促进因素和障碍。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0285395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285395. eCollection 2023.
4
Prospective predictors of sustainment of multiple EBPs in a system-driven implementation context: Examining sustained delivery based on administrative claims.系统驱动实施背景下多种循证实践持续应用的前瞻性预测因素:基于行政索赔数据对持续交付情况的考察
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Dec 23;2:26334895211057884. doi: 10.1177/26334895211057884. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
An mHealth Platform for Augmenting Behavioral Health in Primary Care: Longitudinal Feasibility Study.一个用于增强初级保健中行为健康的移动健康平台:纵向可行性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 1;6(7):e36021. doi: 10.2196/36021.
6
Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention.运用定性比较分析揭示项目持续开展的多种途径:对基于社区的青少年药物滥用预防工作的启示
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 May 26;3(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00303-4.
7
Sustainment stories: a qualitative analysis of barriers to sustainment of the National Rural Transitions of Care Nurse Program.维持故事:对国家农村过渡护理护士计划维持障碍的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 28;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07420-1.
8
Scaling up population health interventions from decision to sustainability - a window of opportunity? A qualitative view from policy-makers.扩大从决策到可持续性的人群健康干预措施——一个机遇之窗?政策制定者的定性观点。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 9;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00636-3.
9
Public reporting on pharmaceutical industry-led access programs: alignment with the WHO medicine programs evaluation checklist.关于制药行业主导的获取项目的公开报告:与世界卫生组织药品项目评估清单的一致性
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Mar 26;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-0204-z. eCollection 2020.
10
When Do Therapists Stop Using Evidence-Based Practices? Findings from a Mixed Method Study on System-Driven Implementation of Multiple EBPs for Children.治疗师何时停止使用循证实践?一项混合方法研究对系统驱动的多种循证实践用于儿童的发现。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Mar;47(2):323-337. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00987-2.