De Filippo M, Bertellini A, Sverzellati N, Pogliacomi F, Costantino C, Vitale M, Zappia M, Corradi D, Garlaschi G, Zompatori M
Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Radiological Sciences, University of Parma, Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Acta Radiol. 2008 Jun;49(5):540-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850801935559.
The presence of subcutaneous implants, such as permanent defibrillators, is an absolute contraindication to the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Moreover, MRI is unadvisable in subjects with metallic hardware near the area of study, as artifacts generated by such materials distort image quality.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and indications of arthrography with multidetector computed tomography arthrography (arthro-MDCT) of the shoulder in patients with absolute or relative contraindications to MRI and in patients with periarticular metal implants using diagnostic arthroscopy as the gold standard.
After intraarticular injection of iodixanol and volumetric acquisition, 70 shoulders in 70 patients (30 females, 40 males, age range 32-60 years) were examined with a 16-detector-row CT scanner. The patients had arthralgia but no radiologically detected fractures. They could not be studied by MRI because of absolute contraindications (subcutaneous electronic implants), surgical metal implants, or claustrophobia. In 28 of the 70 patients who had had previous shoulder surgery, the arthro-CT examination was preceded by an MRI on the same day. All examinations were interpreted by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. The findings were compared with arthroscopic findings carried out within 28 days of the CT study.
In the 42 non-operated patients, the comparison between arthro-MDCT and arthroscopy showed sensitivity and specificity ranging between 87% and 100%. In the 28 operated shoulders, arthro-MDCT had an accuracy of 94% compared with 25% with MRI. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (kappa=0.95) in the evaluation of all types of lesions, both on MDCT and MRI. When arthro-MDCT was compared with MRI in the postoperative patients by a McNemar test, a significant difference (P<0.05) was found between these two techniques.
Arthro-MDCT of the shoulder is a safe technique that provides accurate diagnosis in identifying chondral, fibrocartilaginous, and intraarticular ligamentous lesions in patients who cannot be evaluated by MRI, and in patients after surgery.
皮下植入物的存在,如永久性除颤器,是使用磁共振成像(MRI)的绝对禁忌证。此外,对于研究区域附近有金属硬件的受试者,MRI也是不可取的,因为此类材料产生的伪影会扭曲图像质量。
以诊断性关节镜检查为金标准,评估在MRI绝对或相对禁忌证患者以及有关节周围金属植入物的患者中,肩关节多排螺旋CT关节造影(关节MDCT)的诊断准确性和适应证。
在关节内注射碘克沙醇并进行容积采集后,使用16排CT扫描仪对70例患者(30例女性,40例男性,年龄范围32 - 60岁)的70个肩部进行检查。患者有关节痛但无放射学检测到的骨折。由于绝对禁忌证(皮下电子植入物)、手术金属植入物或幽闭恐惧症,他们无法接受MRI检查。在70例曾接受肩部手术的患者中,28例在同一天先进行了MRI检查,然后进行关节CT检查。所有检查均由两名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生解读。将检查结果与CT研究后28天内进行的关节镜检查结果进行比较。
在42例未手术患者中,关节MDCT与关节镜检查的比较显示敏感性和特异性在87%至100%之间。在28个手术肩部中,关节MDCT的准确率为94%,而MRI为25%。在评估MDCT和MRI上的所有类型病变时,观察者间一致性几乎完美(kappa = 0.95)。通过McNemar检验将术后患者的关节MDCT与MRI进行比较时,发现这两种技术之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。
肩关节关节MDCT是一种安全的技术,可在无法通过MRI评估的患者以及手术后患者中准确诊断软骨、纤维软骨和关节内韧带损伤。