Suppr超能文献

自我报告吸烟状况的有效性:急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者与普通人群的比较。

Validity of self-reported smoking status: Comparison of patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndrome and the general population.

作者信息

Pell Jill P, Haw Sally J, Cobbe Stuart M, Newby David E, Pell Alastair C H, Oldroyd Keith G, Murdoch David L, Pringle Stuart D, Dunn Frank G, Macintyre Paul D, Gilbert Timothy J, Fischbacher Colin M, Borland William

机构信息

BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 May;10(5):861-6. doi: 10.1080/14622200802023858.

Abstract

Many studies rely on self-reported smoking status. We hypothesized that patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), a smoking-related condition, would be more prone to misclassify themselves as ex-smokers, because of pressure to quit. We compared patients admitted with ACS with a general population survey conducted in the same country at a similar time. We determined whether ACS patients who classified themselves as ex-smokers (n = 635) were more likely to have cotinine levels suggestive of smoking deception than self-reported ex-smokers in the general population (n = 289). On univariate analysis, the percentage of smoking deceivers was similar among ACS patients and the general population (11% vs. 12%, p = .530). Following adjustment for age, sex and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, ACS patients were significantly more likely to misclassify themselves (adjusted OR = 14.06, 95% CI 2.13-93.01, p = .006). There was an interaction with age whereby the probability of misclassification fell significantly with increasing age in the ACS group (adjusted OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97, p<.001), but not in the general population. Overall, smoking deception was more common among ACS patients than the general population. Studies comparing patients with cardiovascular disease and healthy individuals risk introducing bias if they rely solely on self-reported smoking status. Biochemical confirmation should be undertaken in such studies.

摘要

许多研究依赖于自我报告的吸烟状况。我们推测,患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)这种与吸烟相关疾病的患者,由于戒烟压力,更有可能将自己误分类为已戒烟者。我们将因ACS入院的患者与同一国家在相似时间进行的一项普通人群调查进行了比较。我们确定,将自己归类为已戒烟者的ACS患者(n = 635)是否比普通人群中自我报告的已戒烟者(n = 289)更有可能出现可替宁水平提示吸烟欺骗的情况。单因素分析显示,ACS患者和普通人群中吸烟欺骗者的比例相似(11%对12%,p = 0.530)。在对年龄、性别和环境烟草烟雾暴露进行调整后,ACS患者更有可能误分类自己(调整后的OR = 14.06,95%CI 2.13 - 93.01,p = 0.006)。存在年龄交互作用,即ACS组中误分类的概率随年龄增加而显著下降(调整后的OR = 0.95,95%CI 0.93 - 0.97,p < 0.001),但在普通人群中并非如此。总体而言,吸烟欺骗在ACS患者中比普通人群中更常见。如果仅依赖自我报告的吸烟状况,比较心血管疾病患者和健康个体的研究有引入偏差的风险。此类研究应进行生化确认。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验