• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

躁狂、抑郁及混合情感状态的情感自评量表的编制与验证

Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.

作者信息

Adler Mats, Liberg Benny, Andersson Stig, Isacsson Göran, Hetta Jerker

机构信息

Affective Disorders Clinic M59, Pyschiatry Southwest, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-14186 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):130-5. doi: 10.1080/08039480801960354.

DOI:10.1080/08039480801960354
PMID:18569776
Abstract

Most rating scales for affective disorders measure either depressive or hypomanic/manic symptoms and there are few scales for hypomania/mania in a self-rating format. We wanted to develop and validate a self-rating scale for comprehensive assessment of depressive, manic/hypomanic and mixed affective states. We developed an 18-item self-rating scale starting with the DSM-IV criteria for depression and mania, with subscales for depression and mania. The scale was evaluated on 61 patients with a diagnosis of affective disorder, predominantly bipolar disorder type I, using Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hypomania Interview Guide-Clinical version (HIGH-C) and Clinical Global Impression scale, modified for bipolar patients (CGI-BP) as reference scales. Internal consistency of the scale measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the depression subscale and 0.91 for the mania subscale. Spearman's correlation coefficients (two-tailed) between the depression subscale and MADRS was 0.74 (P<0.01) and between mania subscale and HIGH-C 0.80 (P<0.01). A rotated factor analysis of the scale supported the separation of symptoms in the mania and depression subscale. We established that the self-rating scales sensitivity to identify mixed states, with combined cut-offs on the MADRS and HIGH-C as reference, was 0.90 with a specificity of 0.71. The study shows that the Affective Self Rating Scale is highly correlated with ratings of established interview scales for depression and mania and that it may aid the detection of mixed affective states.

摘要

大多数情感障碍评定量表测量的是抑郁症状或轻躁狂/躁狂症状,很少有自评形式的轻躁狂/躁狂量表。我们希望开发并验证一种自评量表,用于综合评估抑郁、躁狂/轻躁狂及混合情感状态。我们从抑郁和躁狂的DSM-IV标准出发,开发了一个包含18个条目的自评量表,设有抑郁和躁狂分量表。该量表在61例诊断为情感障碍的患者中进行评估,这些患者主要为I型双相情感障碍,使用蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、轻躁狂访谈指南临床版(HIGH-C)以及为双相情感障碍患者修改的临床总体印象量表(CGI-BP)作为参照量表。通过克朗巴赫α系数测量,该量表抑郁分量表的内部一致性为0.89,躁狂分量表为0.91。抑郁分量表与MADRS之间的斯皮尔曼相关系数(双侧)为0.74(P<0.01),躁狂分量表与HIGH-C之间为0.80(P<0.01)。对该量表进行的旋转因子分析支持了躁狂和抑郁分量表中症状的分离。我们确定,以MADRS和HIGH-C的联合临界值为参照,该自评量表识别混合状态的敏感性为0.90,特异性为0.71。研究表明,情感自评量表与既定的抑郁和躁狂访谈评定量表高度相关,可能有助于检测混合情感状态。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.躁狂、抑郁及混合情感状态的情感自评量表的编制与验证
Nord J Psychiatry. 2008;62(2):130-5. doi: 10.1080/08039480801960354.
2
Validating affective temperaments in their subaffective and socially positive attributes: psychometric, clinical and familial data from a French national study.验证情感气质的亚情感和社会积极属性:来自一项法国全国性研究的心理测量、临床和家族数据。
J Affect Disord. 2005 Mar;85(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.12.009.
3
Clinical and psychometric characterization of depression in mixed mania: a report from the French National Cohort of 1090 manic patients.混合性躁狂中抑郁的临床与心理测量特征:来自法国1090名躁狂患者全国队列的报告
J Affect Disord. 2006 Dec;96(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.01.005.
4
Cross validation with the mood disorder questionnaire (MDQ) of an instrument for the detection of hypomania in Spanish: the 32 item hypomania symptom check list (HCL-32).使用用于检测西班牙语躁狂发作的工具——32项轻躁狂症状检查表(HCL-32),与心境障碍问卷(MDQ)进行交叉验证。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):43-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.040. Epub 2006 Dec 26.
5
Concordance of self-rated and observer-rated dysphoric symptoms in mania.躁狂症中自评与他人评定的烦躁症状的一致性。
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):294-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
6
The Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS): its development, validation and utility.双相抑郁评定量表(BDRS):其开发、验证及效用
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Sep;9(6):571-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00536.x.
7
A tetrachoric factor analysis validation of mixed depression.混合性抑郁症的四分相关因素分析验证
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
8
Towards a reconceptualization of mixed states, based on an emotional-reactivity dimensional model.基于情绪反应维度模型对混合状态进行重新概念化。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Aug;101(1-3):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.027. Epub 2007 Jan 22.
9
Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.汉密尔顿抑郁量表/蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表访谈的开发与信度:一种综合抑郁症状评定量表
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 29;145(1):21-37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
10
Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice.患者自评和临床医生评定的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表:在临床实践中的评估。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Mar;121(3):268-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.037. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar Disorder Symptom Monitoring Measures: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Preferences.双相情感障碍症状监测措施:患者偏好的混合方法研究。
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2024 Mar-Apr;65(2):148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.11.266. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
The effect of resilience on bipolar mood during specialty clinic treatment.韧性对专科诊所治疗期间双相心境的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Feb 15;347:314-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Clinician preferences for using bipolar disorder symptom severity and quality of life scales for measurement-based care.
临床医生对于使用双相情感障碍症状严重程度量表和生活质量量表进行基于测量的治疗的偏好。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Nov-Dec;73:123-125. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Validity of the Aktibipo Self-rating Questionnaire for the Digital Self-assessment of Mood and Relapse Detection in Patients With Bipolar Disorder: Instrument Validation Study.Aktibipo自评问卷在双相情感障碍患者情绪数字自我评估和复发检测中的有效性:工具验证研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):e26348. doi: 10.2196/26348.
5
Self-report depression screening measures for older Hispanic/Latin American adults: A PRISMA systematic review.针对老年西班牙裔/拉丁裔成年人的自我报告抑郁筛查措施:PRISMA 系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Nov 1;294:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.049. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
6
Systematic Review of Symptom Assessment Measures for Use in Measurement-Based Care of Bipolar Disorders.用于双相情感障碍基于测量的护理的症状评估措施的系统评价。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 May 1;70(5):396-408. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800383. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Residual Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder Type II: A Single-Subject Design Pilot Study.基于互联网的II型双相情感障碍残留症状认知行为疗法:一项单病例设计的试点研究。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Apr 23;4(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3910.
8
The functional anatomy of psychomotor disturbances in major depressive disorder.重性抑郁障碍精神运动性障碍的功能解剖学。
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 10;6:34. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.
9
Saving time and money: a validation of the self ratings on the prospective NIMH Life-Chart Method (NIMH-LCM).节省时间和金钱:对美国国立精神卫生研究所前瞻性生活图表法(NIMH-LCM)自评的验证
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 May 7;14:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-130.
10
Activated depression: mixed bipolar disorder or agitated unipolar depression?激活型抑郁:混合性双相障碍还是激越性单相抑郁?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Aug;15(8):376. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0376-1.