Bembenek Andreas, String Andreas, Gretschel Stephan, Schlag Peter M
Department of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert-Rössle-Klinik, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Buch im Helios Klinikum Berlin, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;17(3):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2008.05.003. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in colorectal cancer (CRC) is a controversial issue. Different detection techniques, various protocols for the histopathological work-up of the SLN and a greatly differing experience between the investigators make the comparison of the available studies problematic. Nevertheless, it is clear, that the successful clinical application of SLNB in breast cancer and melanoma cannot simply be transferred into colorectal cancer treatment. In this paper we try to define the current status of clinical application of this technique in CRC by means of a literature review and our own experience. Moreover, the background and the potential clinical implications of additionally small tumor deposits in the SLN (so-called "upstaging") is critically reviewed. Summarizing the results, it is clear, that the value of SLNB in CRC is still unclear. If current techniques are to be applied outside a study protocol and no patient selection is performed the correct identification of macrometastases needs further investigation. Although still under debate, there is otherwise growing evidence, that -at least if RT-PCR-techniques are used- the detection of small tumor deposits in the SLN may be of prognostic and therefore clinical value. Future studies should focus on two subjects: First, alternative detection techniques and careful patient selection may clarify, if an improvement of the sensitivity to detect macrometastases is feasible. Second, large prospective trials using a standardized histopathological lymph node assessment should compare SLN and Non-SLN for its incidence to bear small tumor deposits. If SLNB proves to be sensitive, the prognostic and predictive value of these additional findings should be clarified.
结直肠癌(CRC)的前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是一个存在争议的问题。不同的检测技术、前哨淋巴结(SLN)组织病理学检查的各种方案以及研究者之间差异极大的经验,使得对现有研究进行比较存在困难。然而,很明显,SLNB在乳腺癌和黑色素瘤中的成功临床应用不能简单地移植到结直肠癌治疗中。在本文中,我们试图通过文献综述和我们自己的经验来界定该技术在结直肠癌临床应用中的现状。此外,还对SLN中额外小肿瘤沉积物(所谓的“分期上调”)的背景和潜在临床意义进行了批判性综述。总结结果可以清楚地看出,SLNB在结直肠癌中的价值仍不明确。如果要在研究方案之外应用当前技术且不进行患者选择,对大转移灶的正确识别仍需进一步研究。尽管仍在争论中,但越来越多的证据表明,至少如果使用逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)技术,检测SLN中的小肿瘤沉积物可能具有预后价值,因此具有临床意义。未来的研究应集中在两个方面:第一,替代检测技术和谨慎的患者选择可能会阐明提高检测大转移灶敏感性是否可行。第二,使用标准化组织病理学淋巴结评估的大型前瞻性试验应比较SLN和非SLN中小肿瘤沉积物的发生率。如果证明SLNB具有敏感性,则应阐明这些额外发现的预后和预测价值。