Ezekowitz Justin A, Lee Douglas S, Tu Jack V, Newman Alice M, McAlister Finlay A
Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.102. Epub 2008 May 9.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved systolic function (ejection fraction [EF] >50%) is common, yet no proven therapies exist. Large registries could shed light on what medications may or may not be useful to reduce hospitalization and mortality. The EFFECT Registry, which prospectively enrolled 9,943 patients admitted to the hospital for HF from 1999 to 2001 in 103 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, was used. Patients discharged alive were divided into those with EF >50% and EF <50%. Discharge medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, beta blockers [BBs], spironolactone, and digoxin) were examined for their association with HF rehospitalization or death during 1 year. In the HF group with EF >50% (n = 1,026), 199 patients died within 1 year and 349 patients died or were hospitalized for HF within 1 year. In the HF group with EF <50% (n = 1,898), 427 patients died and 720 patients died or were hospitalized for HF. In the HF group with EF >50%, 67% were administered an ACE inhibitor; 32%, a BB; 37%, digoxin; and 12%, spironolactone. No differences were seen in adjusted survival for any medications (ACE inhibitors, BBs, digoxin, or spironolactone) examined in the HF group with EF >50% despite an adjusted survival benefit with ACE inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.94), BBs (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.89), and spironolactone (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.98) in patients with low EF. In conclusion, none of the medications proved to improve outcomes in patients with HF with low EF showed an association with outcomes in patients with HF and EF >50%, highlighting the need for randomized trial evidence to define therapies that will be beneficial in patients with HF and preserved systolic function.
射血分数保留(射血分数[EF]>50%)的心力衰竭(HF)很常见,但尚无经证实有效的治疗方法。大型注册研究可能会揭示哪些药物可能有助于或无助于降低住院率和死亡率。本研究使用了加拿大安大略省103家医院的EFFECT注册研究,该研究前瞻性纳入了1999年至2001年因HF入院的9943例患者。存活出院的患者被分为EF>50%和EF<50%两组。研究了出院时使用的药物(血管紧张素转换酶[ACE]抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂[BBs]、螺内酯和地高辛)与1年内HF再住院或死亡的相关性。在EF>50%的HF组(n=1026)中,199例患者在1年内死亡,349例患者在1年内死亡或因HF住院。在EF<50%的HF组(n=1898)中,427例患者死亡,720例患者死亡或因HF住院。在EF>50%的HF组中,67%的患者使用了ACE抑制剂;32%使用了BBs;37%使用了地高辛;12%使用了螺内酯。尽管在EF较低的患者中,ACE抑制剂(风险比[HR]0.85,95%置信区间[CI]0.77至0.94)、BBs(HR 0.80,95%CI 0.72至0.89)和螺内酯(HR 0.80,95%CI 0.66至0.98)有调整后的生存获益,但在EF>50%的HF组中,所研究的任何药物(ACE抑制剂、BBs、地高辛或螺内酯)的调整后生存率均无差异。总之,在EF较低的HF患者中被证明能改善预后的药物,在EF>50%的HF患者中均未显示出与预后相关,这突出表明需要随机试验证据来确定对HF且射血分数保留的患者有益的治疗方法。