Dittmar Miriam, Abbot-Smith Kirsten, Lieven Elena, Tomasello Michael
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany, and Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Dev Sci. 2008 Jul;11(4):575-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00703.x.
Using a preferential looking methodology with novel verbs, Gertner, Fisher and Eisengart (2006) found that 21-month-old English children seemed to understand the syntactic marking of transitive word order in an abstract, verb-general way. In the current study we tested whether young German children of this same age have this same understanding. Following Gertner et al. (2006), one group of German children was tested only after they had received a training/practice phase containing transitive sentences with familiar verbs and the exact same nouns as those used at test. A second group was tested after a training/practice phase consisting only of familiar verbs, without the nouns used at test. Only the group of children with the training on full transitive sentences was successful in the test. These findings suggest that for children this young to succeed in this test of syntactic understanding, they must first have some kind of relevant linguistic experience immediately prior to testing--which raises the question of the nature of children's linguistic representations at this early point in development.
格特纳、费舍尔和艾森加特(2006年)采用一种针对新动词的优先注视方法,发现21个月大的英国儿童似乎能够以一种抽象的、动词通用的方式理解及物语序的句法标记。在本研究中,我们测试了同一年龄段的德国幼儿是否也有同样的理解。按照格特纳等人(2006年)的方法,一组德国儿童仅在接受了一个训练/练习阶段后才进行测试,该阶段包含带有熟悉动词和与测试中使用的完全相同名词的及物句子。另一组儿童在仅由熟悉动词组成、没有测试中使用的名词的训练/练习阶段后进行测试。只有接受了完整及物句子训练的儿童组在测试中取得了成功。这些发现表明,对于这么小的儿童来说,要在这种句法理解测试中取得成功,他们必须在测试前立即有某种相关的语言经验——这就引出了在这个早期发展阶段儿童语言表征性质的问题。