• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[主动脉弓上血管的磁共振血管造影与数字血管造影的比较]

[Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography of the epiaortic vessels].

作者信息

Carriero A, Salute L, Toppetti A, Bonomo L

机构信息

Istituto di Scienze Radiologiche e Formazione dell'Immagine, Università di Chieti.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 1991 Jun;81(6):781-6.

PMID:1857782
Abstract

Atheromasic lesions and other pathologic conditions of the arterial vessels of the neck are the most frequent causes of cerebrovascular disease. Diagnostic imaging currently employs digital subtraction angiography (DSA), Doppler, and color-Doppler US to study these conditions. Digital subtraction intraarterial angiography (DSAA) can provide both an early diagnosis and an accurate preoperative depiction of neck vessels; however, in spite of its effective value, it still remains an invasive technique. Magnetic Resonance angiography (angio-MR) is the latest technique allowing the depiction of neck vessels morphology. It shares with digital angiography the capability of supplying spatial depiction of all the examined vascular structures, and with US its noninvasiveness. The authors investigated angio-MR capabilities in providing accurate and detailed images of neck arteries; the images were then compared with DSA ones. Thirty patients with cerebrovascular diseases were studied. MR imaging was performed with a 1.5 T unit with a dedicated coil, and gradient-echo sequences were employed. Refocused sequences for flow were acquired on both the coronal and the sagittal planes, with the following parameters: TR 40, TE 10, flip angle 25 degrees, acquisition volumes 80-35 mm, 64-15 frames. Digital angiography demonstrated 101 vascular lesions: 27 slight stenoses (less than 30%), 19 mild stenoses (31-70%), 12 severe stenoses (71-99%), 7 occlusions, 14 coilings, 7 kinkings, and 15 hypoplasias of vertebral artery. In slight stenoses, angio-MR underestimated the condition in 11/27 patients. In mild and severe stenoses, as well as in occlusive diseases, angio-MR tended to overestimate the condition. In coiling, kinking, and hypoplasia, angio-MR yielded the same results as DSA.

摘要

颈部动脉血管的动脉粥样硬化病变及其他病理状况是脑血管疾病最常见的病因。目前诊断性成像采用数字减影血管造影(DSA)、多普勒及彩色多普勒超声来研究这些情况。数字减影动脉内血管造影(DSAA)既能早期诊断,又能对颈部血管进行准确的术前描绘;然而,尽管其具有实用价值,但它仍是一种侵入性技术。磁共振血管造影(血管MR)是描绘颈部血管形态的最新技术。它与数字血管造影一样,能够提供所有被检查血管结构的空间描绘,并且与超声一样具有非侵入性。作者研究了血管MR在提供颈部动脉准确详细图像方面的能力;然后将这些图像与DSA图像进行比较。对30例脑血管疾病患者进行了研究。使用配备专用线圈的1.5T设备进行MR成像,并采用梯度回波序列。在冠状面和矢状面上采集血流重聚焦序列,参数如下:TR 40,TE 10,翻转角25度,采集容积80 - 35mm,64 - 15帧。数字血管造影显示101处血管病变:27处轻度狭窄(小于30%),19处中度狭窄(31 - 70%),12处重度狭窄(71 - 99%),7处闭塞,14处迂曲,7处扭结,以及15处椎动脉发育不全。在轻度狭窄中,血管MR在27例患者中有11例低估了病情。在中度和重度狭窄以及闭塞性疾病中,血管MR往往高估病情。在迂曲、扭结和发育不全方面,血管MR与DSA结果相同。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital angiography of the epiaortic vessels].[主动脉弓上血管的磁共振血管造影与数字血管造影的比较]
Radiol Med. 1991 Jun;81(6):781-6.
2
[Magnetic resonance angiography of the neck vessels: technique and anatomy].[颈部血管的磁共振血管造影:技术与解剖]
Radiol Med. 1990 Sep;80(3):213-8.
3
Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.股腘动脉闭塞再通术后介入性动脉内磁共振血管造影的诊断陷阱
Acta Radiol. 2008 Dec;49(10):1129-36. doi: 10.1080/02841850802508942.
4
[Magnetic resonance angiography of the vessels of the neck: the optimization of a dynamic technic during the rapid infusion of a paramagnetic contrast medium].[颈部血管的磁共振血管造影:在快速注入顺磁性造影剂过程中动态技术的优化]
Radiol Med. 1997 Oct;94(4):325-8.
5
[Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].[颈动脉分叉处狭窄闭塞。磁共振血管造影与数字血管造影对比造影检查]
Radiol Med. 1998 Mar;95(3):170-3.
6
Value of single-dose contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in therapy indications in abdominal and iliac arteries.单剂量对比增强磁共振血管造影与动脉内数字减影血管造影在腹主动脉和髂动脉治疗指征中的价值
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):376-82. doi: 10.1007/s00270-006-0132-6.
7
Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.3.0特斯拉混合技术外周对比增强磁共振血管造影的可行性:与数字减影血管造影的比较
Invest Radiol. 2008 Sep;43(9):642-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e90ba.
8
Diagnosis of systemic arterial diseases with whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.利用全身三维对比增强磁共振血管造影术诊断系统性动脉疾病。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Nov 5;119(21):1772-8.
9
[First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].[使用1.0摩尔钆布醇进行对比增强磁共振血管造影术在外周动脉闭塞性疾病中的首次临床结果——与动脉内数字减影血管造影术的比较]
Rofo. 2003 Apr;175(4):556-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38446.
10
[Angiography compared to high resolution magnetic resonance and digital angiography in atherosclerosis of the iliac-femoral arteries].[髂股动脉粥样硬化中血管造影与高分辨率磁共振成像及数字血管造影的比较]
Radiol Med. 1998 Mar;95(3):165-9.