Trinh Hanh Q, Begun James W, Luke Roice D
Health Care Administration and Informatics Program, Department of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):192-202. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000324903.19272.0c.
Hospital administrators face challenging decisions about whether to maintain, cut, or add services in response to changes in consumer demand or managed-care pressures. The challenge is heightened for services that are also offered by other hospitals in the local community.
This study provides evidence on the financial effects of providing services that are also provided by other hospitals in the same county. Its purpose is to help guide administrators and policy makers in assessing the wisdom of service duplication at the local level.
METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The unit of analysis is the individual hospital. The study reports data from the 2,204 general acute care hospitals located in counties with more than one hospital. A longitudinal path model is constructed for the years 1998, 2000, and 2002, with environmental and organizational factors from 1998 affecting service duplication in 2000, which in turn affects financial performance in 2002. Maximum likelihood estimation in linear structural relations is used to evaluate the path model and its coefficients.
Hospital competition is associated with higher levels of duplication of inpatient, ancillary, and high-tech services. Duplication of inpatient services is associated with higher costs but also with higher operating margin. Duplication of ancillary services is associated with higher return on assets. Duplicated high-tech services are financial losers for hospitals. Higher levels of duplicated high-tech services are associated with higher cost per day, higher cost per discharge, and lower operating margin.
From the standpoint of financial impact on the hospital, administrators should reexamine the costs and benefits of offering high-tech services that are offered by other providers in the local area. The higher costs may not be offset by revenues. Duplicated ancillary and inpatient services, on the other hand, produce some positive financial returns.
医院管理者面临着具有挑战性的决策,即根据消费者需求的变化或管理式医疗的压力,决定是维持、削减还是增加服务。对于当地社区其他医院也提供的服务而言,这一挑战更为严峻。
本研究提供了关于提供同一县内其他医院也提供的服务所产生的财务影响的证据。其目的是帮助指导管理者和政策制定者评估地方层面服务重复的合理性。
方法/途径:分析单位是个体医院。该研究报告了位于有多家医院的县的2204家综合急性护理医院的数据。构建了1998年、2000年和2002年的纵向路径模型,1998年的环境和组织因素影响2000年的服务重复情况,而这又反过来影响2002年的财务绩效。使用线性结构关系中的最大似然估计来评估路径模型及其系数。
医院竞争与更高水平的住院、辅助和高科技服务重复相关。住院服务重复与更高的成本相关,但也与更高的营业利润率相关。辅助服务重复与更高的资产回报率相关。重复的高科技服务对医院来说是财务亏损项目。更高水平的重复高科技服务与更高的每日成本、更高的每次出院成本以及更低的营业利润率相关。
从对医院的财务影响角度来看,管理者应重新审视提供当地其他供应商也提供的高科技服务的成本和收益。更高的成本可能无法被收入抵消。另一方面,重复的辅助和住院服务会产生一些积极的财务回报。