Suppr超能文献

战斗支援医院中血管外科手术的损伤控制复苏

Damage control resuscitation for vascular surgery in a combat support hospital.

作者信息

Fox Charles J, Gillespie David L, Cox E Darrin, Kragh John F, Mehta Sumeru G, Salinas Jose, Holcomb John B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2008 Jul;65(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318176c533.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage from extremity wounds is a leading cause of potentially preventable death during modern combat operations. Optimal management involves rapid hemostasis and reversal of metabolic derangements utilizing damage control principles. The traditional practice of damage control surgery favors a life over limb approach and discourages elaborate, prolonged vascular reconstructions. We hypothesized that limb preservation could be successful when the damage control approach combines advanced resuscitative strategies and modern vascular techniques.

METHODS

Trauma Registry records at a Combat Support Hospital from April to June 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with life-threatening hemorrhage (defined as >4 units of packed red blood cells) who underwent simultaneous revascularization for a pulseless extremity were included. Data collection included the initial physiologic parameters in the emergency department (ED), total and 24-hour blood product requirements, and admission physiology and laboratory values in the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcome measures were survival, graft patency, and amputation rate at 7 days.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent 20 vascular reconstructions for upper (3) or lower extremity (17) wounds. Patients were hypotensive (blood pressure 105/60 +/- 29/18), acidotic (pH 7.27 +/- 0.1; BD -7.50 +/- 5.5), and coagulopathic (international normalized ratio 1.3 +/- 0.4) on arrival to the ED and essentially normal upon admission to the ICU, 4 hours later. Vein grafts (19/20, 95%) were used preferentially. Prosthetic grafts (1), shunting and delayed repair (4) or amputation (1) were infrequent. Heparin was not used or limited to a half dose (5/20, 25%). Tourniquets (12/16, 75%) and fasciotomies (13/16, 81%) were routine. Most (75%) received recombinant factor VIIa in the ED and in the operating room. All survived with normalized physiology on arrival in the ICU. Twenty-four-hour crystalloid use averaged 7.1 +/- 3.2 L, whereas packed red blood cells averaged 23 +/- 18 units, and 88% were massively transfused. Median operative time was 4.5 hours (range, 1.7-8.4 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive damage control resuscitation maneuvers in critically injured casualties successfully permitted prolonged, complex extremity revascularization with excellent early limb salvage and graft patency. Recombinant VIIa and liberal resuscitation with fresh whole blood, plasma, platelets and cryoprecipitate, while minimizing crystalloid, allowed limb salvage and did not result in early graft failures.

摘要

背景

在现代战斗行动中,四肢伤口出血是潜在可预防死亡的主要原因。最佳治疗方法是利用损伤控制原则迅速止血并纠正代谢紊乱。损伤控制手术的传统做法倾向于保生命而非保肢体,不鼓励进行复杂、耗时的血管重建。我们推测,当损伤控制方法结合先进的复苏策略和现代血管技术时,保肢可能会成功。

方法

回顾性分析了一家战斗支援医院2006年4月至6月的创伤登记记录。纳入了因危及生命的出血(定义为输注超过4单位浓缩红细胞)而同时接受无脉肢体血管重建的患者。数据收集包括急诊科的初始生理参数、全血制品和24小时血制品需求量,以及重症监护病房的入院生理和实验室值。观察指标为7天时的生存率、移植物通畅率和截肢率。

结果

16例患者接受了20次上肢(3例)或下肢(17例)伤口的血管重建。患者到达急诊科时血压低(105/60±29/18)、酸中毒(pH 7.27±0.1;碱缺失-7.50±5.5)、凝血功能障碍(国际标准化比值1.3±0.4),4小时后入住重症监护病房时基本恢复正常。优先使用静脉移植物(19/20,95%)。人工血管移植物(1例)、分流和延迟修复(4例)或截肢(1例)较少见。未使用肝素或仅使用半量肝素(5/20,25%)。常规使用止血带(12/16,75%)和筋膜切开术(13/16,81%)。大多数患者(75%)在急诊科和手术室接受了重组凝血因子VIIa治疗。所有患者在入住重症监护病房时均存活且生理指标恢复正常。24小时晶体液平均用量为7.1±3.2升,浓缩红细胞平均用量为23±18单位,88%的患者接受了大量输血。中位手术时间为4.5小时(范围1.7 - 8.4小时)。

结论

对重伤员积极采取损伤控制复苏措施成功地实现了长时间、复杂的四肢血管重建,早期保肢效果良好且移植物通畅率高。重组凝血因子VIIa以及用新鲜全血、血浆、血小板和冷沉淀进行充分复苏,同时尽量减少晶体液用量,既实现了保肢,又未导致早期移植物失败。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验