Suppr超能文献

尿液中重组人促红细胞生成素的检测:与当前反兴奋剂检测相关的问题

Testing for recombinant human erythropoietin in urine: problems associated with current anti-doping testing.

作者信息

Lundby Carsten, Achman-Andersen Niels J, Thomsen Jonas J, Norgaard Anne M, Robach Paul

机构信息

Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Rigshospitalet section 7652, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):417-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.90529.2008. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

the main action of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) is to increase the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood. To prevent a possible misuse of rHuEpo, this is tested in urine samples collected from athletes by World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited laboratories. Recently the test has met serious critiques, and the aims of the present study were to investigate the detection power of the test as well as the variability in the test power comparing the results of two WADA-accredited laboratories.

METHODS

eight human subjects were studied for 7 wk and treated with rHuEpo for 4 wk with 2 wk of "boosting" followed by 2 wk of "maintenance" and a post period of 3 wk. Urine samples were obtained during all periods.

RESULTS

laboratory A determined rHuEpo misuse in all subjects during the boosting period, whereas laboratory B found no misuse, with one sample to be negative, and the remaining seven to be suspicious. The detection rates decreased throughout the maintenance and post period when total hemoglobin mass and exercise performance were elevated. During this period, laboratory A found only two of 24 samples to be positive and three to be suspicious, and laboratory B found no positive or suspicious samples.

CONCLUSION

this study demonstrates a poor agreement in test results comparing two WADA-accredited laboratories. Moreover, after the initial rHuEpo boosting period the power to detect rHuEpo misuse during the maintenance and post periods appears minimal.

摘要

背景

重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEpo)的主要作用是增加血液的携氧能力。为防止rHuEpo的可能滥用,世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)认可的实验室对从运动员采集的尿液样本进行检测。最近该检测受到了严重批评,本研究的目的是调查该检测的检测能力以及比较两个WADA认可实验室的检测能力差异。

方法

对8名受试者进行了7周的研究,用rHuEpo治疗4周,先进行2周的“强化”,接着是2周的“维持”,之后有3周的后期阶段。在所有阶段均采集尿液样本。

结果

在强化阶段,实验室A判定所有受试者存在rHuEpo滥用情况,而实验室B未发现滥用情况,有1份样本为阴性,其余7份为可疑。在维持期和后期,当总血红蛋白量和运动表现升高时,检测率下降。在此期间,实验室A在24份样本中仅发现2份阳性、3份可疑,实验室B未发现阳性或可疑样本。

结论

本研究表明,比较两个WADA认可实验室的检测结果时,一致性较差。此外,在最初的rHuEpo强化期之后,在维持期和后期检测rHuEpo滥用的能力似乎极小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验