Suppr超能文献

利用扩散张量成像鉴别典型与非典型脑膜瘤。

Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging.

作者信息

Toh C-H, Castillo M, Wong A M-C, Wei K-C, Wong H-F, Ng S-H, Wan Y-L

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Oct;29(9):1630-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1170. Epub 2008 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas may have implications in preoperative planning but may not be possible on the basis of conventional MR imaging. Our hypothesis was that classic and atypical meningiomas have different patterns of intratumoral water diffusion that will allow for differentiation between them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed in 12 classic and 12 atypical meningiomas. Signal intensity of solid-enhancing tumor regions on diffusion-weighted trace images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps was assessed. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in solid-enhancing regions, peritumoral edema, and contralateral normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) to measure tensor metrics including major (lambda(1)), intermediate (lambda(2)) and minor eigenvalues (lambda(3)) and FA and ADC values. Distribution of tensor shapes within enhancing tumors was calculated for all tumors. Differences between classic and atypical meningiomas in tumor signal intensity, intratumoral and peritumoral tensor metrics, as well as tensor shapes distribution were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A significantly greater proportion of atypical meningiomas were isointense and hypointense on ADC maps (P = .007). Classic meningiomas had significantly lower FA (P = .012), higher ADC (P = .011), greater lambda(2) (P = .020) and lambda(3) (P = .003). There was significantly more spherical diffusion in classic than in atypical meningiomas (P = .020). All diffusion tensor metrics for peritumoral edema of the 2 tumor groups did not differ.

CONCLUSION

DTI showed that intratumoral microscopic water motion is less organized in classic than in atypical meningiomas. This feature may allow for noninvasive differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas.

摘要

背景与目的

经典型和非典型脑膜瘤的鉴别对术前规划可能具有重要意义,但基于传统磁共振成像可能无法实现。我们的假设是,经典型和非典型脑膜瘤具有不同的瘤内水扩散模式,这将有助于二者的鉴别。

材料与方法

对12例经典型和12例非典型脑膜瘤进行术前扩散张量成像(DTI)。评估扩散加权追踪图像上实性强化肿瘤区域的信号强度以及表观扩散系数(ADC)和分数各向异性(FA)图。在实性强化区域、瘤周水肿和对侧正常白质(NAWM)中放置感兴趣区(ROI),以测量张量指标,包括主(λ1)、中(λ2)和小特征值(λ3)以及FA和ADC值。计算所有肿瘤强化肿瘤内张量形状的分布。对经典型和非典型脑膜瘤在肿瘤信号强度、瘤内和瘤周张量指标以及张量形状分布方面的差异进行统计学分析。

结果

非典型脑膜瘤在ADC图上等信号和低信号的比例显著更高(P = 0.007)。经典型脑膜瘤的FA显著更低(P = 0.012),ADC更高(P = 0.011),λ2(P = 0.020)和λ3(P = 0.003)更大。经典型脑膜瘤的球形扩散明显多于非典型脑膜瘤(P = 0.020)。两组肿瘤瘤周水肿的所有扩散张量指标均无差异。

结论

DTI显示,经典型脑膜瘤瘤内微观水运动的有序性低于非典型脑膜瘤。这一特征可能有助于经典型和非典型脑膜瘤的无创鉴别。

相似文献

1
Differentiation between classic and atypical meningiomas with use of diffusion tensor imaging.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Oct;29(9):1630-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1170. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
3
Diffusion tensor imaging provides an insight into the microstructure of meningiomas, high-grade gliomas, and peritumoral edema.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5):577-82. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318261e913.
5
Role of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating subtypes of meningiomas.
J Neuroradiol. 2010 Dec;37(5):277-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
7
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Oct;156(10):1837-45. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2149-y. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas.
Neuroradiology. 2006 Aug;48(8):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0094-z. Epub 2006 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Malignant Meningiomas: From Diagnostics to Treatment.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 23;15(5):538. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050538.
3
Surgical Management of High-Grade Meningiomas.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 23;16(11):1978. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111978.
4
A Histopathologic Correlation Study Evaluating Glymphatic Function in Brain Tumors by Multiparametric MRI.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Nov 1;30(21):4876-4886. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-0150.
7
Differentiation between various types and subtypes of intracranial meningiomas with advanced MRI.
SA J Radiol. 2022 Oct 26;26(1):2480. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2480. eCollection 2022.
9
Diagnostic Implications of White Matter Tract Involvement by Intra-axial Brain Tumors.
Cureus. 2021 Nov 8;13(11):e19355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19355. eCollection 2021 Nov.
10
Whole-brain 3D MR fingerprinting brain imaging: clinical validation and feasibility to patients with meningioma.
MAGMA. 2021 Oct;34(5):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s10334-021-00924-1. Epub 2021 May 4.

本文引用的文献

2
The contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to distinguishing typical from atypical meningiomas.
Neuroradiology. 2006 Aug;48(8):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0094-z. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
3
Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):475-87.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: a review.
Neurosurgery. 2005 Sep;57(3):538-50; discussion 538-50. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000170980.47582.a5.
5
Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging.
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):985-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353031338. Epub 2005 Apr 15.
6
The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;31(2):141-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00621.x.
9
A geometric analysis of diffusion tensor measurements of the human brain.
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Aug;44(2):283-91. doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<283::aid-mrm16>3.0.co;2-v.
10
Cerebral edema associated with meningiomas: the role of peritumoral brain tissue.
J Neurooncol. 1998 Feb;36(3):285-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1005874926358.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验