Suppr超能文献

不同牙本质粘结剂在根尖倒充填窝洞封闭效果的比较:一项细菌渗漏研究

Comparison of the sealing of different dentin bonding adhesives in root-end cavities: a bacterial leakage study.

作者信息

Er Kürşat, Taşdemir Tamer, Bayramoğlu Gülçin, Siso Seyda Hergüner

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):152-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the root-end sealing of the different dentin-bonding adhesives (DBAs) in root-end cavities using a bacterial leakage system.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred extracted single-rooted teeth were instrumented, and root-ends were resected and ultrasonically prepared. All teeth were then randomly assigned to 6 experimental groups (n = 15) and 2 control groups (positive and negative control; n = 5) for root-end filling with iBond (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany), G-bond (GC Co., Tokyo, Japan), Xeno III Bond (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE), AdheSe Bond (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaa, Liechenstein), Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray, Osaka, Japan), or Clearfil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray). All preparations were further restored with a hybrid resin composite (Renew; Bisco, Schaumburg, IL). Nail varnish was applied to all external root surfaces to the level of the resected root-ends to prevent lateral microleakage. Samples were sterilized in an ethylene oxide sterilizer for 12 h. The apical 3-4 mm of the roots were immersed in brain-heart infusion culture medium with phenol red indicator within culture chambers. The coronal access of each specimen was inoculated every 48 h with a suspension of Enterococcus faecalis. Bacterial leakage was monitored every 24 h for 4 weeks. The data obtained were analyzed using a chi-squared test, with alpha = .05 as the level for statistical significance.

RESULTS

All positive controls leaked within 24 h; none of the negative controls leaked. Under the conditions of the study, despite some variations, there were no statistically significant differences in rate of bacterial leakage among the experimental test materials at 1-4 weeks (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of DBA had no influence in the bacterial leakage of the root-end fillings.

摘要

目的

使用细菌渗漏系统比较不同牙本质粘结剂(DBA)在根尖倒充填窝洞中的根尖封闭效果。

研究设计

选取100颗拔除的单根牙进行根管预备,切除根尖并超声预备根尖倒充填窝洞。然后将所有牙齿随机分为6个实验组(n = 15)和2个对照组(阳性和阴性对照;n = 5),分别使用iBond(德国哈瑙贺利氏古莎公司)、G-bond(日本东京GC公司)、Xeno III Bond(美国特拉华州米尔福德登士柏/卡沃公司)、AdheSe Bond(列支敦士登沙恩义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)、Clearfil Protect Bond(日本大阪可乐丽公司)或Clearfil Tri-S Bond(日本大阪可乐丽公司)进行根尖倒充填。所有窝洞均用复合树脂(Renew;美国伊利诺伊州绍姆堡必思科公司)进一步修复。在所有牙根的外表面至根尖切除水平涂抹指甲油,以防止侧向微渗漏。样本在环氧乙烷灭菌器中灭菌12小时。将牙根根尖3 - 4毫米部分浸泡在含有酚红指示剂的脑心浸液培养基中,置于培养箱内。每隔48小时向每个样本的冠方入口接种粪肠球菌悬液。连续4周每隔24小时监测细菌渗漏情况。采用卡方检验分析所得数据,以α = 0.05作为统计学显著性水平。

结果

所有阳性对照组在24小时内均发生渗漏;所有阴性对照组均未发生渗漏。在本研究条件下,尽管存在一些差异,但在1 - 4周时,各实验组材料的细菌渗漏率之间无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

牙本质粘结剂的类型对根尖倒充填物的细菌渗漏无影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验