Suppr超能文献

Resilon、Pro Root MTA和Super-EBA作为根尖充填材料的封闭性比较:一项细菌渗漏研究。

Comparison of the sealing of Resilon, Pro Root MTA, and Super-EBA as root-end filling materials: a bacterial leakage study.

作者信息

Maltezos Christos, Glickman Gerald N, Ezzo Paul, He Jianing

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.015. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the root-end sealing of the Resilon/Epiphany system (RES) to Pro Root MTA and Super-EBA using a bacterial leakage system. Fifty-five extracted teeth were instrumented and root-ends were resected and ultrasonically prepared. Test materials were placed in the root-end preparations; Streptococcus salivarius was introduced coronally and the apical 4 mm were immersed in BHI culture medium with phenol red indicator. Bacterial leakage was monitored every 24 h for 4 wk. All positive controls leaked within 24 h; none of the negative controls leaked. Based on chi2 analysis (p < 0.05), RES and MTA leaked significantly less than Super-EBA. There was no statistical difference between RES and MTA. RES may be a viable option as a root-end filling material with good surgical isolation.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是使用细菌渗漏系统,比较Resilon/Epiphany系统(RES)与Pro Root MTA和Super-EBA的根尖封闭情况。55颗拔除的牙齿经预备后,切除根尖并进行超声预备。将测试材料置于根尖预备处;从冠方引入唾液链球菌,将根尖4mm浸入含酚红指示剂的脑心浸液培养基中。连续4周,每24小时监测细菌渗漏情况。所有阳性对照在24小时内发生渗漏;所有阴性对照均未发生渗漏。基于卡方分析(p<0.05),RES和MTA的渗漏显著少于Super-EBA。RES和MTA之间无统计学差异。RES作为一种根尖充填材料,在良好的手术隔离条件下可能是一种可行的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验