Maltezos Christos, Glickman Gerald N, Ezzo Paul, He Jianing
Department of Endodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA.
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):324-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.015. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the root-end sealing of the Resilon/Epiphany system (RES) to Pro Root MTA and Super-EBA using a bacterial leakage system. Fifty-five extracted teeth were instrumented and root-ends were resected and ultrasonically prepared. Test materials were placed in the root-end preparations; Streptococcus salivarius was introduced coronally and the apical 4 mm were immersed in BHI culture medium with phenol red indicator. Bacterial leakage was monitored every 24 h for 4 wk. All positive controls leaked within 24 h; none of the negative controls leaked. Based on chi2 analysis (p < 0.05), RES and MTA leaked significantly less than Super-EBA. There was no statistical difference between RES and MTA. RES may be a viable option as a root-end filling material with good surgical isolation.
本体外研究的目的是使用细菌渗漏系统,比较Resilon/Epiphany系统(RES)与Pro Root MTA和Super-EBA的根尖封闭情况。55颗拔除的牙齿经预备后,切除根尖并进行超声预备。将测试材料置于根尖预备处;从冠方引入唾液链球菌,将根尖4mm浸入含酚红指示剂的脑心浸液培养基中。连续4周,每24小时监测细菌渗漏情况。所有阳性对照在24小时内发生渗漏;所有阴性对照均未发生渗漏。基于卡方分析(p<0.05),RES和MTA的渗漏显著少于Super-EBA。RES和MTA之间无统计学差异。RES作为一种根尖充填材料,在良好的手术隔离条件下可能是一种可行的选择。